TNIK / TRAF2 and NCK-interacting protein kinase · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for TNIK

Source-linked TNIK Western blot protocol options, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-TNIK WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled September 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for TNIK: expected band ~154.9 kDa, hero antibody A03934-3, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable TNIK Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~154.9 kDa, antibody A03934-3, controls and PMC citations. Open the full TNIK WB guide →

TNIK Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, source-linked protocol options, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~154.9 kDa
Observed band ~180 and 150 kDa
Gel 5–20% (catalog A03934-3)
Positive control ⓘ Appendix (IHC candidate; verify WB) +4 more
Negative control ⓘ Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM Phosphorylated
Caveat Phosphorylation-state controls
Gene-set association MSigDB C7 membership
Isoform 8 isoform(s)
Section 1

Source-Linked TNIK Western Blot Protocol Options

The A03934-3 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysatehuman K562, human HEL (catalog A03934-3)
Gel %5–20% (catalog A03934-3)
Load30 ug; reducing conditions (catalog A03934-3)
Transfera nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes (catalog A03934-3)
Membranenitrocellulose membrane (catalog A03934-3)
Blocking5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT (catalog A03934-3)
Primary antibodyA03934-3 · 0.5 μg/mL (catalog A03934-3)
Primary incubationovernight at 4°C (catalog A03934-3)
Secondary antibodygoat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP, 1:5000 (catalog A03934-3)
Secondary incubation1.5 hour at RT (catalog A03934-3)
WashTBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each (catalog A03934-3)
DetectionECL (catalog A03934-3)
Section 2

What Is the Expected TNIK Western Blot Band Size?

TNIK is predicted at 154.9 kDa, while antibody QC shows bands near 180 and 150 kDa; the cause of their difference is not established.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Band near 150 kDaEmpirical TNIK-reactive band close to the 154.9 kDa predicted mass
Band near 180 kDaEmpirical TNIK-reactive band whose higher migration position is unexplained
Bands near 180 and 150 kDaBoth bands were observed in reducing whole-cell lysates; their distinct identities are unresolved
Band near 155 kDaPosition expected from the UniProt predicted mass, subject to band-identity confirmation
Weak band in a soluble fractionTNIK may also reside in nuclear, endosomal, or cytoskeletal fractions
💡Expected TNIK appearanceTNIK has a predicted mass of 154.9 kDa, while antibody QC reports bands near 180 and 150 kDa; their identities and the cause of the difference require ordinary band-identity controls.
How each factor affects band size
UniProt predicted mass154.9 kDa is the sequence-based reference; empirical TNIK-reactive bands occur near 180 and 150 kDa
Splice isoform 1Its separate apparent size is not supplied
Splice isoforms 2, 3, and 4Sequence differences may affect apparent size, but their relative sizes are not supplied
Splice isoforms 5, 6, 7, and 8Sequence differences may affect apparent size, but their relative sizes are not supplied
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
No band in lysateTNIK distribution across nuclear, endosomal, and cytoskeletal compartments may limit recovery in the prepared lysateCheck extraction and relevant fractions with a positive control
Band higher than expectedThe observed 180 kDa band exceeds the 154.9 kDa prediction; its cause is not establishedConfirm identity by TNIK depletion and compare with the reported QC pattern
Band lower than expectedThe observed 150 kDa band lies near the predicted mass; its precise identity is unconfirmedCompare with the reported QC pattern and confirm by TNIK depletion
Multiple bandsIsoforms 1 through 8 exist, but their migration and contribution to the observed bands are unknownConfirm band identities by TNIK depletion and assess expressed isoforms if needed
Weak or no signalTNIK may be poorly recovered from the sampled cellular fractionCheck nuclear and cytoskeletal fractions alongside a positive control
Fragments below expected sizeFragment identity is not established by the supplied featuresCheck sample integrity and confirm TNIK specificity by depletion

Sample controls for TNIK Western blot

🧪HPA-IHC candidate guidance (verify in WB): For positive controls for TNIK in Western blot, you can use appendix tissue lysate, where HPA reports high expression.
Positive control: Appendix (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Negative control: Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain such as Ponceau alongside the samples.
⚠️Feasibility: HPA identifies high-expression and not-detected tissues, making a tissue control pair feasible.

HPA tissue expression evidence for TNIK

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Appendix glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Colon glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Duodenum glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Gallbladder glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Rectum glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Adipose tissue adipocytes Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Cervix glandular cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Esophagus squamous epithelial cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Ovary ovarian stroma cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Skin fibroblasts Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Section 3

Advanced TNIK Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for TNIK, answered from its protein features.

How should TNIK band migration be interpreted?
Band shift · Use the separately labelled calculated mass and catalog-observed evidence above. A sequence annotation does not establish an observed migration shift. Verify target identity with orthogonal controls.
Could TNIK isoforms produce different bands?
Isoforms · Eight isoforms are listed. Relative to the canonical sequence, residues 445–473 are missing in isoforms 2, 5, 6, and 8; 537–591 in 3, 5, 7, and 8; and 795–802 in 4, 6, 7, and 8. Check whether the antibody epitope falls within a deleted segment when comparing bands.

Isoforms 3, 5, 7, and 8 lack canonical residues 537–591, which include the listed S560, S570, and T581 sites. Account for that deletion when interpreting site-specific signals. Coordinates here follow the supplied canonical UniProt sequence.
Which TNIK phosphorylation sites matter when interpreting band changes?
PTM · UniProt lists phosphothreonine at T187 and T581, and phosphoserine at S324, S326, S560, S570, S600, S608, S610, S640, S678, S680, S688, S701, S707, S720, S764, S766, S769, and S959. These are canonical UniProt coordinates; antibody or paper numbering may differ. Their presence alone does not establish a visible mobility shift.
Does this guide establish induction of TNIK?
Induction · No general induction response is established by this guide. A pathway or gene-set association is not evidence of induction in a particular specimen. Verify the relevant treatment and control in a target-specific experiment.
What transfer method to use for TNIK Western blot?
Transfer · The supplied features give a predicted mass of 154.9 kDa but do not specify a transfer method. Choose and verify a transfer setup that recovers proteins around the observed ~150 and ~180 kDa positions; check the membrane and remaining gel before interpreting a missing band.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the A03934-3 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
How should TNIK bands be quantified across samples?
Quantitation · Quantify the same verified band across samples and report ~150 and ~180 kDa bands separately until their identities are established. TNIK has eight isoforms and is listed in the nucleus, cytoplasm, recycling endosomes, and cytoskeletal fraction, so keep sample preparation and fraction choice consistent.
Do the ~150 and ~180 kDa bands match TNIK's predicted mass?
Interpretation · TNIK's predicted mass is 154.9 kDa, close to the observed ~150 kDa band. The ~180 kDa band has a higher apparent mass. TNIK's listed phosphorylation sites and splice variants do not, by themselves, establish why either band migrates there. Verify band identity before assigning either band to a specific form.

First compare each band's apparent mass with the 154.9 kDa prediction and the observed ~150 and ~180 kDa bands. Consider the documented splice deletions and antibody epitope coverage. Listed phosphorylation sites are candidates for investigation, but neither a band shift nor its cause follows from site annotation alone.
Boster reagents

TNIK Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western blot analysis of TNIK using anti-TNIK antibody (A03934-3). Electrophoresis was performed on a 5-20% SDS-PAGE gel at 70V (Stacking gel) / 90V (Resolving gel) for 2-3 hours. The sample well of each lane was loaded with 30 ug of sample under reducing conditions. Lane 1: human K562 whole cell lysates, Lane 2: human HEL whole cell lysates. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes. Blocked the membrane with 5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT. The membrane was incubated with rabbit anti-TNIK antigen affinity purified polyclonal antibody (Catalog # A03934-3) at 0.5 μg/mL overnight at 4°C, then washed with TBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each and probed with a goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:5000 for 1.5 hour at RT. The signal is developed using an Enhanced Chemiluminescent detection (ECL) kit (Catalog # EK1002) with Tanon 5200 system. A specific band was detected for TNIK at approximately 180,150 kDa. The expected band size for TNIK is at 155 kDa.
Anti-TNIK Antibody Picoband®
Cat # A03934-3

The catalog reports one anti-TNIK antibody, A03934-3, with stated human and mouse reactivity. Its Western blot image uses human K562 and HEL whole-cell lysates and reports bands near 180 and 150 kDa, versus an expected 155 kDa. No publication or orthogonal validation evidence is supplied.

Which to pick: A03934-3 is the only listed option. Its image provides a starting reference for human K562 and HEL lysates at 0.5 μg/mL antibody. Mouse reactivity is listed, but the supplied image does not test a mouse sample.

Source: BosterBio TNIK gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.