WTAP / Pre-mRNA-splicing regulator WTAP · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for WTAP

Real validated WTAP Western blot protocols, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-WTAP WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled September 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for WTAP: expected band ~44.2 kDa, hero antibody A04296-2, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable WTAP Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~44.2 kDa, antibody A04296-2, controls and PMC citations. Open the full WTAP WB guide →

WTAP Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, validated protocols, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~44.2 kDa
Observed band ~50 kDa
Gel 8% (catalog A04296-2)
Positive control ⓘ Adrenal gland (IHC candidate; verify WB) +4 more
Negative control ⓘ Heart muscle (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM Phosphorylated + Acetylated
Caveat Phosphorylation-state controls
Gene-set association MSigDB C7 membership
Isoform 2 isoform(s)
Section 1

Real Curated WTAP Western Blot Protocols

The A04296-2 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysatehuman Hela, human 293T, human THP-1 (catalog A04296-2)
Gel %8% (catalog A04296-2)
Load30 ug; reducing conditions (catalog A04296-2)
Transfera nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes (catalog A04296-2)
Membranenitrocellulose membrane (catalog A04296-2)
Blocking5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT (catalog A04296-2)
Primary antibodyA04296-2 · 1:1000 (catalog A04296-2)
Primary incubationovernight at 4°C (catalog A04296-2)
Secondary antibodygoat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP, 1:5000 (catalog A04296-2)
Secondary incubation1.5 hour at RT (catalog A04296-2)
WashTBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each (catalog A04296-2)
DetectionECL (catalog A04296-2)
Section 2

What Is the Expected WTAP Western Blot Band Size?

WTAP is predicted at 44.2 kDa and observed near 50 kDa; the cause of this difference is not established by the supplied evidence.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Band at ~50 kDaEmpirical WTAP band in reducing whole-cell lysates; confirm identity with controls
Band near 44.2 kDaNear the predicted WTAP mass, but band identity needs confirmation
Two bands at different positionsCould reflect WTAP isoforms 1 and 2; distinct migration is unverified
Faint band in a cytoplasmic fractionConsistent with WTAP being mainly nuclear
💡Expected WTAP appearanceWTAP has a predicted mass of 44.2 kDa, while antibody QC shows a ~50 kDa band in reducing whole-cell lysates; the difference is unexplained, so confirm identity with ordinary controls.
How each factor affects band size
Predicted WTAP mass44.2 kDa from the UniProt sequence; observed migration is ~50 kDa
Alternative splicingProduces isoforms 1 and 2, whose relative apparent sizes are unspecified
WTAP isoform 1Its apparent size relative to isoform 2 is not supplied
WTAP isoform 2Its apparent size relative to isoform 1 is not supplied
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
No band in lysateWTAP is mainly nuclear or its signal is below detectionCheck a validated positive lysate and a nuclear fraction
Band higher than expectedThe ~50 kDa empirical band exceeds the 44.2 kDa prediction for an undetermined reasonCompare with the validated ~50 kDa band and confirm identity by WTAP depletion
Band lower than expectedAn alternative isoform or sample degradation is possibleCheck sample integrity and confirm the band by WTAP depletion
Multiple bandsIsoforms 1 and 2 may contribute, but their migration is unspecifiedUse WTAP depletion and isoform-aware validation to identify the bands
Weak or no signalLimited WTAP signal in the tested fraction is possibleCheck a validated positive lysate and enrich the nuclear fraction
Fragments below expected sizeSample degradation is possible; no WTAP cleavage feature is suppliedPrepare fresh lysate with protease inhibitors and confirm band identity

Sample controls for WTAP Western blot

🧪HPA-IHC candidate guidance (verify in WB): For positive controls for WTAP in Western blot, you can use adrenal gland tissue, which HPA rates High.
Positive control: Adrenal gland (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Negative control: Heart muscle (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain such as Ponceau alongside.
⚠️Feasibility: WTAP is mainly nuclear, so nuclear-enriched lysate may give a clearer positive signal.

HPA tissue expression evidence for WTAP

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Adrenal gland glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Appendix glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Bone marrow hematopoietic cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Breast glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Bronchus respiratory epithelial cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Heart muscle cardiomyocytes Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Liver cholangiocytes Low Protein (IHC) HPA →
Salivary gland glandular cells Low Protein (IHC) HPA →
Skeletal muscle myocytes Low Protein (IHC) HPA →
Spleen cells in white pulp Low Protein (IHC) HPA →
Section 3

Advanced WTAP Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for WTAP, answered from its protein features.

How should WTAP band migration be interpreted?
Band shift · Use the separately labelled calculated mass and catalog-observed evidence above. A sequence annotation does not establish an observed migration shift. Verify target identity with orthogonal controls.
Could WTAP isoforms produce different bands?
Isoforms · UniProt lists two isoforms. Relative to isoform 1, isoform 2 has S151R and lacks residues 152–396, using UniProt canonical coordinates. A lower band could be consistent with isoform 2, but band position alone cannot confirm its identity. Check whether the antibody epitope is retained in isoform 2.
Which WTAP modifications matter when interpreting bands?
PTM · UniProt canonical coordinates list N-acetylmethionine at 1; phosphoserine at 14, 305, 306, 341, and 388; and phosphothreonine at 350. Isoform 2 lacks the listed sites from 305 onward. These annotations do not establish a visible band shift.
Does this guide establish induction of WTAP?
Induction · No general induction response is established by this guide. A pathway or gene-set association is not evidence of induction in a particular specimen. Verify the relevant treatment and control in a target-specific experiment.
How should transfer be checked for WTAP?
Transfer · Standard workflow guidance: verify transfer efficiency for the intended target size before interpreting a weak signal. Use total-protein assessment and optimize transfer for the membrane, gel and apparatus; the labelled catalog values take precedence.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the A04296-2 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
How should WTAP localization affect quantitation?
Quantitation · WTAP is mainly nuclear, in speckles and nucleoplasm, with some cytoplasmic fraction. Keep the sample fraction consistent across lanes and comparisons. A nuclear extract and a whole-cell lysate may yield different WTAP amounts even when starting material is comparable.
Why does WTAP appear near 50 kDa instead of 44.2 kDa?
Interpretation · 44.2 kDa is the predicted mass, while ~50 kDa is the observed apparent band. WTAP has annotated modifications, but their presence alone does not establish the cause of this difference. Use the observed band position alongside antibody specificity controls when identifying WTAP.

Consider isoform 2, which lacks UniProt canonical residues 152–396. An antibody recognizing that deleted region would not detect intact isoform 2. Compare the band with the antibody epitope and the expected isoform sequence before assigning it to WTAP.

The supplied features list no signal peptide, propeptide, or glycosylation sites. They therefore provide no basis for assigning an additional band to cleavage of those peptides or glycosylation. The listed isoform difference and modifications offer possibilities to investigate, but neither identifies an unexpected band by itself.
Boster reagents

WTAP Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western blot analysis of WTAP using anti-WTAP antibody (A04296-2). Electrophoresis was performed on a 8% SDS-PAGE gel at 80V (Stacking gel) / 120V (Resolving gel) for 2 hours. The sample well of each lane was loaded with 30 ug of sample under reducing conditions. Lane 1: human Hela whole cell lysates, Lane 2: human 293T whole cell lysates, Lane 3: human THP-1 whole cell lysates, Lane 4: human K562 whole cell lysates, Lane 5: rat PC-12 whole cell lysates, Lane 6: mouse NRK whole cell lysates. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes. Blocked the membrane with 5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT. The membrane was incubated with rabbit anti-WTAP antigen affinity purified polyclonal antibody (A04296-2) at 1:1000 overnight at 4°C, then washed with TBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each and probed with a goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:5000 for 1.5 hour at RT. The signal is developed using an ECL Plus Western Blotting Substrate (Catalog # AR1196-200) with Tanon 5200 system. A specific band was detected for WTAP at approximately 50 kDa. The expected band size for WTAP is at 44 kDa.
Anti-WTAP Antibody
Cat # A04296-2

A04296-2 is a rabbit polyclonal anti-WTAP antibody listed for human, mouse, and rat. Its WB caption reports a band near 50 kDa, versus 44 kDa expected, in the tested cell lysates. No publication or independent validation evidence is supplied.

Which to pick: A04296-2 is the only listed option and has a WB image. The caption reports HeLa, 293T, THP-1, K562, PC-12, and NRK lysates tested at 1:1000 primary dilution. Match your sample and conditions to these reported examples when planning a blot.

Source: BosterBio WTAP gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.