This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.
- Table of Contents
Plan paraffin section ECM1 IHC around cytoplasmic staining in squamous epithelia and epididymal glands (HPA tissue IHC). The catalog antibody was demonstrated at 1:50 (datasheet M02861-1); interpret staining with ECM1 secretion in mind (UniProt).
Expected localisation, validated protocols, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.
| Expected localisation | Observed cytoplasmic; molecularly secreted to ECM (HPA tissue IHC; UniProt) | |
| Staining pattern | Cytoplasmic staining in squamous and epididymal glandular cells (HPA tissue IHC) | |
| Antigen retrieval | EDTA pH 8.0 HIER, heat-mediated (datasheet M02861-1) | |
| Positive control | Epididymis+4 more · see all | |
| Negative control | Adipose tissue+4 more · see all |
| Fixation | Keep fixation conditions consistent across sections. (standard IHC practice; not target-specific) | |
| Caveat | Secreted ECM1 may stain away from its source cells (HPA tissue IHC) | |
| Regulation | Higher expression in breast cancer tissue (UniProt) | |
| Isoform / epitope | 4 isoforms; mature chain 20–540; check epitope coverage (UniProt) |
Compare the catalog antibody’s IHC-P protocol (datasheet M02861-1) with published ECM1 staining in HCC (PMC4962417) and endometrial samples (PMC13231627).
| Sample | Paraffin-embedded mouse heart tissue; fixative not specified (datasheet M02861-1) |
| Fixation | Image fixative and duration unreported (datasheet M02861-1); verify before use. |
| Sectioning | 4–5 µm sections on charged slides (standard) |
| Deparaffinisation | Xylene, graded ethanol series to water (standard) |
| Antigen retrieval | Heat retrieval: EDTA pH 8.0 (datasheet M02861-1); 20 min, 95–100 °C (standard) |
| Peroxidase block | 3% H2O2, 10 min, room temperature (standard) |
| Blocking | 10% goat serum (datasheet M02861-1) |
| Primary antibody | Rabbit monoclonal (clone 25E30) anti-ECM1, 1:50 (datasheet M02861-1) |
| Primary incubation | Overnight at 4 °C (datasheet M02861-1) |
| Detection | HRP-conjugated secondary, DAB chromogen (datasheet M02861-1) |
| Counterstain | Hematoxylin, blue, dehydrate and mount (standard) |
| Expected result | ECM1-positive staining in glandular cells of epididymis (HPA tissue IHC: High). HPA tissue profile: Cytoplasmic expression in squamous epithelia and in glandular cells of epididymis. No signal in the no-primary control. |
ECM1 is secreted into the extracellular space and matrix and has no transmembrane segment (UniProt Q16610: location, topology). In tissue IHC, expect chiefly cytoplasmic staining in epididymal glandular cells and squamous epithelia (HPA: tissue IHC profile). HPA rates its tissue IHC reliability Enhanced, while reporting medium agreement between staining and RNA and disregarded presumed off-target binding (HPA: tissue IHC reliability).
| Strong cytoplasmic staining in epididymal glandular cells. | This matches the clearest supplied positive tissue: HPA scores these cells High (HPA: epididymis). Compare the stained cells with tissue morphology before scoring; ECM1 is secreted, so the cell producing it and extracellular protein need not occupy identical locations (UniProt Q16610: location; HPA: reliability description). |
| Moderate cytoplasmic staining in squamous epithelium. | This fits HPA's tissue profile: squamous epithelial cells score Medium in esophagus, tonsil and vagina; cells in the skin corneal layer also score Medium (HPA: tissue IHC). Record the cell layer and distribution as well as intensity, because an entire tissue should not be treated as uniformly positive (HPA: cell-specific tissue scores). |
| Dominant nuclear-only staining on a tissue section. | This differs from the cytoplasmic tissue IHC profile and warrants review of morphology, detection controls and antibody performance (HPA: tissue IHC profile; standard IHC practice). HPA separately reports approved nucleoplasmic signal in ICC-IF, so a nuclear observation alone does not prove an artefact (HPA: subcellular ICC-IF). |
| Strong staining in cells scored Not detected by HPA, or widespread colour outside identifiable structures. | Treat this as a specificity or background question, not an ECM1-positive call. Examples of HPA Not detected cell populations include adipocytes in adipose tissue and hematopoietic cells in bone marrow (HPA: tissue IHC). Cross-reactivity or endogenous detection activity can produce unexpected staining (standard IHC practice); HPA also notes presumed off-target binding (HPA: reliability description). |
| No signal in epididymal glandular cells on a run intended to detect ECM1. | The expected High HPA signal is missing (HPA: epididymis). First assess tissue preservation, the staining run and its positive and detection controls (standard IHC practice). A failed run cannot establish that ECM1 is absent from the sample; HPA's Enhanced rating does not validate every antibody or staining condition (HPA: tissue reliability; standard IHC practice). |
| Secreted protein and processing | ECM1 has a signal peptide at residues 1–19 and a mature chain at 20–540 (UniProt Q16610: processing). Extracellular signal can therefore be considered alongside cellular staining, but HPA's reported tissue IHC pattern is cytoplasmic (UniProt Q16610: location; HPA: tissue IHC profile). |
| Cell-specific reference levels | HPA scores epididymal glandular cells High and esophageal, tonsillar and vaginal squamous epithelial cells Medium (HPA: tissue IHC). Use these as pattern references, with the reported cell types and levels kept distinct (HPA: tissue IHC). |
| Agreement with RNA | HPA reports medium consistency between antibody staining and RNA and expects tissue locations of RNA and secreted protein to differ (HPA: reliability description). An RNA result alone should not determine which structure must stain on the slide (HPA: reliability description; standard IHC interpretation). |
| Isoforms and antibody recognition | UniProt lists 4 ECM1 isoforms, but the supplied record gives no antibody epitope or isoform coverage (UniProt Q16610: isoforms; supplied antibody data). Do not infer that staining or its absence measures every isoform; consult the chosen antibody's documented validation before interpreting a discrepancy (standard IHC practice). |
| HPA antibody validation | HPA027241 and HPA076029 each carry an Enhanced IHC status (HPA: antibody validation). That supports their reported IHC patterns, while HPA's tissue summary still notes presumed off-target binding that was disregarded (HPA: reliability description). Interpret unexpected sites against the cell-specific reference pattern and controls (standard IHC practice). |
| IF/ICC Q: should its compartment match tissue IHC? | A: HPA reports mainly cytosolic and additional nucleoplasmic ECM1 in ICC-IF, both approved, whereas its tissue IHC profile is cytoplasmic (HPA: subcellular ICC-IF; HPA: tissue IHC). Assess each application against its own reported pattern; this is an interpretation note, not an IF protocol. |
| Situation | Likely cause | Next action |
|---|---|---|
| Epididymal glandular cells show no or very weak staining. | A run or reagent problem is possible because HPA scores these cells High; the observation alone does not identify which step failed (HPA: epididymis; standard IHC practice). | Check section integrity, positive and detection controls, antibody preparation and the recorded IHC conditions; repeat the run if a control failed (standard IHC practice). |
| Squamous epithelium stains, but the intensity is lower than in epididymis. | This may fit the reference pattern: HPA scores esophageal, tonsillar and vaginal squamous cells Medium versus High in epididymal glandular cells (HPA: tissue IHC). | Score the correct cell layer and compare like tissue and staining conditions before adjusting the assay (HPA: tissue IHC; standard IHC practice). |
| Unexpected cells stain strongly. | Possible explanations include cross-reactivity or endogenous detection activity (standard IHC practice). HPA reports presumed off-target binding in its tissue assessment (HPA: reliability description). | Check morphology and a detection control, then compare the exact cell population with HPA's reported positive and Not detected entries (standard IHC practice; HPA: tissue IHC). |
| Colour covers much of the section without a clear cell or matrix pattern. | Non-specific detection or inadequate background control can obscure cell-specific staining (standard IHC practice). This appearance does not match HPA's defined epithelial and glandular profile (HPA: tissue IHC). | Review the detection control, blocking and washes, then reassess the section for interpretable cell-specific signal (standard IHC practice; HPA: tissue IHC profile). |
| Predominantly nuclear staining appears in tissue IHC. | The result differs from HPA's cytoplasmic tissue profile, although additional nucleoplasmic signal is approved in ICC-IF (HPA: tissue IHC; HPA: subcellular ICC-IF). | Check controls and staining morphology before calling it specific; keep the ICC-IF observation separate from the tissue IHC interpretation (standard IHC practice; HPA: tissue IHC; HPA: subcellular ICC-IF). |
| Staining is seen near cells but does not track their RNA-rich compartment. | ECM1 is secreted, and HPA expects the tissue location of RNA and protein to differ (UniProt Q16610: location; HPA: reliability description). | Describe the observed cellular and extracellular distribution separately, then compare with HPA's tissue IHC pattern and assay controls before assigning specificity (HPA: tissue IHC; standard IHC practice). |
Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue (reliability: Enhanced — Medium consistency between antibody staining and RNA expression data. Secreted protein, tissue location of RNA and protein is expected to differ. Presumed off target binding observed and disregarded.). Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.
| Tissue | Cell type | Level | Evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epididymis | Glandular cells | High | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Esophagus | Squamous epithelial cells | Medium | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Skin | Cells in corneal layer | Medium | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Tonsil | Squamous epithelial cells | Medium | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Vagina | Squamous epithelial cells | Medium | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Tissue | Cell type | Level | Evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adipose tissue | Adipocytes | Not detected | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Appendix | Glandular cells | Not detected | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Bone marrow | Hematopoietic cells | Not detected | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Caudate | Glial cells | Not detected | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Cerebellum | Cells in granular layer | Not detected | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
Use compartment, tissue controls, and matched processing conditions to troubleshoot ECM1 staining in paraffin sections. The IF question addresses the separate fluorescence workflow.
Anti-ECM1 antibody M02861-1 has IHC images from paraffin-embedded mouse and rat heart sections (IHC image captions). IF/ICC is listed as an application, but no IF image is supplied (catalog applications; catalog IF images).
The sole card, M02861-1, shows IHC in paraffin-embedded mouse and rat heart sections (IHC image captions). The catalog lists IHC and ICC/IF applications and human, mouse and rat reactivity (catalog applications; catalog reactivity).
Which to pick: Choose M02861-1 for paraffin-section IHC because its own images document mouse and rat heart staining; the fixative is unreported (IHC image captions). The same rabbit monoclonal, clone 25E30, is listed for ICC/IF, although no IF image is supplied (catalog host; catalog clone; catalog applications; catalog IF images). It is listed as reactive with human, mouse and rat, while the supplied IHC images document mouse and rat tissue only (catalog reactivity; IHC image captions).