EIF3F / Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit F · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for EIF3F

Source-linked EIF3F Western blot protocol options, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-EIF3F WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled September 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for EIF3F: expected band ~37.6 kDa, hero antibody A30682, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable EIF3F Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~37.6 kDa, antibody A30682, controls and PMC citations. Open the full EIF3F WB guide →

EIF3F Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, source-linked protocol options, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~37.6 kDa
Gel 12–15% (standard starting point)
Positive control ⓘ Adrenal gland (IHC candidate; verify WB) +4 more
Negative control ⓘ Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM Phosphorylated + Acetylated
Caveat Modification-state controls
Gene-set association MSigDB C7 membership
Isoform 1 isoform(s)
Section 1

Source-Linked EIF3F Western Blot Protocol Options

The A30682 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysatevarious cells (catalog A30682)
Gel %12–15% (standard starting point)
Load20–30 µg total protein per lane; optimize for abundance (standard starting point)
TransferStandard semi-dry transfer; verify efficiency (standard starting point)
Membrane0.45 µm PVDF (standard starting point)
Blocking5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST (standard starting point)
Primary antibodyA30682; use the WB datasheet starting dilution (standard starting point)
Primary incubationOvernight at 4 °C (standard starting point)
Secondary antibodySpecies-matched HRP conjugate at validated dilution (standard starting point)
Secondary incubation1 h at room temperature (standard starting point)
Wash3 × 5 min in TBST (standard starting point)
DetectionECL; bracket exposures to avoid saturation (standard starting point)
Section 2

What Is the Expected EIF3F Western Blot Band Size?

EIF3F is predicted at 37.6 kDa; annotated modifications and complex membership could affect appearance, but distinct migration effects are not demonstrated.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Band near 37.6 kDaConsistent with full-length EIF3F; confirm band identity with antibody controls.
Band near 37.6 kDa in cytoplasmic lysateConsistent with EIF3F's annotated cytoplasmic location.
Close doublet near 37.6 kDaCould reflect annotated phosphorylation, but a visible shift is not established.
Higher band under conditions that preserve complexesCould reflect EIF3F in the eIF3 complex; confirm its identity.
💡Expected EIF3F appearanceEIF3F has a predicted mass of 37.6 kDa and no supplied empirical band size; look near 37.6 kDa in cytoplasmic lysate and confirm identity with antibody controls.
How each factor affects band size
Predicted EIF3F massPlaces the full-length protein near 37.6 kDa.
N-acetylalanine at residue 2No visible migration effect is established.
Phosphoserine at residue 46 by CDK11 in vitroA migration shift is not established for cellular blots.
N6-acetyllysine at residue 238No visible migration effect is established.
Phosphoserine at residue 258A migration shift is possible but not demonstrated.
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
No band in lysateEIF3F is cytoplasmic; absence may reflect poor cytoplasmic recovery or detection.Check cytoplasmic extraction, loading, and antibody performance.
Band higher than expectedEIF3F participates in the eIF3 complex, which may persist if denaturation is incomplete.Check denaturation and confirm band identity with antibody controls.
Band lower than expectedNo signal peptide or propeptide cleavage is annotated; the smaller band's identity is uncertain.Check sample integrity and confirm band identity.
Multiple bandsOnly one isoform is annotated; additional bands have no established assignment.Use peptide blocking or another antibody to assess specificity.
Weak or no signalEIF3F may be insufficiently detected in the prepared lysate.Check loading, transfer, and antibody performance.

Sample controls for EIF3F Western blot

🧪HPA-IHC candidate guidance (verify in WB): For positive controls for EIF3F in Western blot, you can use adrenal gland lysate, a high-expression HPA tissue.
Positive control: Adrenal gland (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Negative control: Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain alongside the samples.
⚠️Feasibility: Adipose tissue is reported as not detected, but confirm the negative result in your lysate.

HPA tissue expression evidence for EIF3F

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Adrenal gland glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Breast glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Cervix squamous epithelial cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Endometrium glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Esophagus squamous epithelial cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Adipose tissue adipocytes Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Smooth muscle smooth muscle cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Appendix glandular cells Low Protein (IHC) HPA →
Bone marrow hematopoietic cells Low Protein (IHC) HPA →
Caudate neuronal cells Low Protein (IHC) HPA →
Section 3

Advanced EIF3F Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for EIF3F, answered from its protein features.

How should EIF3F band migration be interpreted?
Band shift · Use the separately labelled calculated mass and catalog-observed evidence above. A sequence annotation does not establish an observed migration shift. Verify target identity with orthogonal controls.
Are alternative EIF3F isoforms expected?
Isoforms · The supplied record lists one isoform and no alternative sequence. It provides no basis for assigning multiple bands to EIF3F isoforms.
Which EIF3F phosphorylation sites are annotated?
PTM · UniProt lists phosphoserine at residue 46, attributed to CDK11 in vitro, and phosphoserine at residue 258. These are UniProt coordinates and may differ from paper or antibody numbering. Neither annotation establishes a detectable band shift.

UniProt lists N-acetylalanine at residue 2 and N6-acetyllysine at residue 238. Check coordinate conventions when comparing antibody or paper descriptions. These annotations do not establish distinct Western blot bands.
Does this guide establish induction of EIF3F?
Induction · No general induction response is established by this guide. A pathway or gene-set association is not evidence of induction in a particular specimen. Verify the relevant treatment and control in a target-specific experiment.
How should transfer be checked for EIF3F?
Transfer · Standard workflow guidance: verify transfer efficiency for the intended target size before interpreting a weak signal. Use total-protein assessment and optimize transfer for the membrane, gel and apparatus; the labelled catalog values take precedence.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the A30682 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
How should EIF3F be quantified on a Western blot?
Quantitation · EIF3F is annotated in the cytoplasm and as a component of the eIF-3 complex. Compare the same candidate band across comparable samples, using a consistent loading reference and exposures within the measurement range. The record does not establish modification-specific bands for separate quantification.
How should an EIF3F band compare with predicted mass?
Interpretation · EIF3F has a predicted mass of 37.6 kDa, but no observed band position is supplied. Use 37.6 kDa as a reference, not an exact expected migration position. The annotated modifications alone do not establish a visible shift or explain any difference from predicted mass.

The record lists one isoform, no glycosylation sites, and no signal peptide or propeptide. Its four modified residues do not, by themselves, explain extra bands. Verify the identity of any unexpected band before assigning it to EIF3F or a particular modification.
Boster reagents

EIF3F Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western Blot analysis of various cells using eIF3ε Polyclonal Antibody
Anti-EIF3F/Eif3 Epsilon Antibody
Cat # A30682

The catalog reports A30682, an anti-EIF3F antibody with reported human, mouse, and rat reactivity. A Western blot image is available, described as analysis of various cells; the supplied evidence does not identify the cell types or establish validation across all three species.

Which to pick: A30682 is the only listed EIF3F option and has a Western blot image. Check that its reported reactivity matches your sample; the image caption does not specify which cells or species were tested.

Source: BosterBio EIF3F gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.