FGF2 Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, validated protocols, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band 30.8 kDa observed
Observed band 30.8 kDa observed
Gel 12-15%
Positive control ⓘ Lung
Negative control ⓘ Appendix
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
ⓘCalculated mass30.8 kDa
ⓘLocalizationSecreted / Nucleus
ⓘProcessing / PTMRecord-dependent
ⓘReactivityHuman / Mouse / Rat
Section 1

Real Curated FGF2 Western Blot Protocols

Start with the molecular-weight rule, then compare verified publication-derived conditions.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysateCaudate
Gel %12-15%
Load20-30 µg total protein per lane
TransferSemi-dry, standard transfer
Membrane0.45 µm PVDF
Blocking5% non-fat milk or 5% BSA in TBST
PrimaryRP1006 at datasheet starting dilution
Primary incubationOvernight at 4 °C with gentle agitation
SecondarySpecies-matched HRP conjugate at validated dilution
Wash3 × 5 min in TBST
DetectionChemiluminescent substrate
ExposureBracket exposures to avoid saturation
Section 2

What Is the Expected FGF2 Western Blot Band Size?

Use the product-observed 30.8 kDa band as the primary planning value and retain the UniProt calculated mass as context.

What am I looking at on my blot?
30.8 kDaMatches the authoritative product WB observation.
30.8 kDa calculatedUse as UniProt context, not as a replacement observed band.
Unexpected additional signalDo not assign identity without orthogonal positive/negative controls.
💡Expected FGF2 appearancePlan around 30.8 kDa and keep the calculated mass as supporting context.
How each factor affects band size
Catalog-observed band30.8 kDa; use this as the primary experimental expectation.
Calculated mass30.8 kDa from UniProt P09038; retain as context.
Gel selection12-15%; shared with the recommended protocol and poster.
Specificity checkCompare the lead HPA positive and negative controls with RP1006.
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
30.8 kDaMatches the authoritative product WB observation.Confirm with orthogonal controls and the linked product record.
Additional bandMay reflect processing, modification, or non-specific signal.Run a dilution series and compare positive/negative controls.
Weak signalTarget abundance or transfer may be limiting.Verify transfer, increase positive-control abundance, and bracket exposure.

Sample controls for FGF2 Western blot

🧪Use Lung as the first positive-control candidate and retain an orthogonal negative control.
Positive control: Lung (High)
Negative control: Appendix (Not detected)
HPA protein score determines control status; other expression data is supporting context only.

HPA tissue expression evidence for FGF2

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart on each tissue page — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Positive expression · recommended positive controls

Tissue Cell type Level Evidence Source
Lung Reported tissue cells High Protein (HPA) HPA →
Caudate Reported tissue cells High Protein (HPA) HPA →
Cerebellum Reported tissue cells High Protein (HPA) HPA →
Smooth muscle Reported tissue cells High Protein (HPA) HPA →

Undetected expression · recommended negative controls

Tissue Cell type Level Evidence Source
Appendix Reported tissue cells Not detected Protein (HPA) HPA →
Bronchus Reported tissue cells Not detected Protein (HPA) HPA →
Section 3

Advanced FGF2 Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for FGF2, answered from its protein features.

Which band should guide the blot?
Use 30.8 kDa, the observation attached to the authoritative RP1006 WB record.
How should calculated mass be interpreted?
Treat the UniProt calculated mass as context; it does not replace the catalog-observed 30.8 kDa expectation.
Which positive control should I start with?
Start with Lung, the lead HPA protein-expression candidate.
Which negative control is defensible?
Use Appendix as an orthogonal HPA Not detected candidate.
Which gel should I use?
Use 12-15% consistently across the quick facts, protocol table, and poster.
What transfer method to use for FGF2 Western blot?
Use the transfer method in the recommended protocol and verify transfer before blocking.
How should RP1006 be started?
Start at the linked datasheet condition and run a three-point primary-antibody dilution test.
Which publication-derived protocols can I compare?
No verified publication protocol was supplied; use only the deterministic recommended protocol.
Boster reagents

FGF2 Western Blot Reagents

Human/Mouse/Rat-reactive FGF2 Western blot reagents with authoritative product imagery.

Real WB dataWestern blot validation image for FGF2 using RP1006; observed band 30.8 kDa
Anti-Fibroblast growth factor 2 FGF2 Antibody Picoband®
Cat # RP1006
Real WB dataWestern blot validation image for FGF2 using A00121-1; observed band 30.8 kDa
Anti-FGF2 Antibody Picoband®
Cat # A00121-1
Real WB dataWestern blot validation image for FGF2 using A00121-3; observed band 30.8 kDa
Anti-FGF2 Antibody Picoband®
Cat # A00121-3
Real WB dataWestern blot validation image for FGF2 using PB9587; observed band 30.8 kDa
Anti-FGF2 Antibody Picoband®
Cat # PB9587

Only image-backed, WB-validated Human/Mouse/Rat recommendations from the prepared catalog evidence are shown.

Source: prepared picoband-wb product evidence; each card retains its own SKU, URL, observed band, and authoritative WB image.