FSHB · Western blot design guide

FSHB Western Blot Planning Guide

Plan a FSHB Western blot around the catalog-observed 14.7 kDa band, image-backed PB9106 evidence, HPA controls, and verified protocol records.

Evidence assembled July 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for FSHB (FSHB): expected band 14.7 kDa, antibody PB9106, and guide-derived SDS-PAGE protocol steps
FSHB Western blot protocol sheet — expected band 14.7 kDa, antibody PB9106, controls and PMC citations. Open the full FSHB WB guide →

FSHB Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, documented protocol parameters, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band 14.7 kDa
Observed band Not reported — verify product WB image
Gel 15%
Positive control ⓘ Pituitary gland
Negative control ⓘ Appendix
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
ⓘ Calculated mass 14.7 kDa
ⓘ Localization Secreted
ⓘ Processing / PTM Record-dependent
ⓘ Reactivity Human / Mouse
Section 1

Real Curated FSHB Western Blot Protocols

Start with the molecular-weight rule, then compare verified publication-derived conditions.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysatePituitary gland
Gel %15%
Load20-30 µg total protein per lane
TransferSemi-dry, short transfer
Membrane0.2 µm PVDF
Blocking5% non-fat milk or 5% BSA in TBST
PrimaryPB9106 at datasheet starting dilution
Primary incubationOvernight at 4 °C with gentle agitation
SecondarySpecies-matched HRP conjugate at validated dilution
Wash3 × 5 min in TBST
DetectionChemiluminescent substrate
ExposureBracket exposures to avoid saturation
Section 2

What Is the Expected FSHB Western Blot Band Size?

Use the product-observed 14.7 kDa band as the primary planning value and retain the UniProt calculated mass as context.

What am I looking at on my blot?
14.7 kDaMatches the authoritative product WB observation.
14.7 kDa calculatedUse as UniProt context, not as a replacement observed band.
Unexpected additional signalDo not assign identity without orthogonal positive/negative controls.
💡Expected FSHB appearancePlan around 14.7 kDa and keep the calculated mass as supporting context.
How each factor affects band size
Catalog-observed band14.7 kDa; use this as the primary experimental expectation.
Calculated mass14.7 kDa from UniProt P01225; retain as context.
Gel selection15%; shared with the recommended protocol and poster.
Specificity checkCompare the lead HPA positive and negative controls with PB9106.
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
14.7 kDaMatches the authoritative product WB observation.Confirm with orthogonal controls and the linked product record.
Additional bandMay reflect processing, modification, or non-specific signal.Run a dilution series and compare positive/negative controls.
Weak signalTarget abundance or transfer may be limiting.Verify transfer, increase positive-control abundance, and bracket exposure.

Sample controls for FSHB Western blot

🧪Use Pituitary gland as the first positive-control candidate and Appendix as the HPA Not detected negative candidate.
Positive control: Pituitary gland (High)
Negative control: Appendix (Not detected)
HPA protein score determines control status; other expression data is supporting context only.

HPA tissue expression evidence for FSHB

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Positive expression · recommended positive controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Pituitary gland Reported tissue cells High Protein (HPA) HPA →

Undetected expression · recommended negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Appendix Reported tissue cells Not detected Protein (HPA) HPA →
Bone marrow Reported tissue cells Not detected Protein (HPA) HPA →
Section 3

Advanced FSHB Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for FSHB, answered from its protein features.

Which band should guide the blot?
Use 14.7 kDa, the observation attached to the authoritative PB9106 WB record.
How should calculated mass be interpreted?
Treat the UniProt calculated mass as context; it does not replace the catalog-observed 14.7 kDa expectation.
Which positive control should I start with?
Start with Pituitary gland, the lead HPA protein-expression candidate.
Which negative control is defensible?
Use Appendix as an orthogonal HPA Not detected candidate.
Which gel should I use?
Use 15% consistently across the quick facts, protocol table, and poster.
What transfer method to use for FSHB Western blot?
Use the transfer method in the recommended protocol and verify transfer before blocking.
How should PB9106 be started?
Start at the linked datasheet condition and run a three-point primary-antibody dilution test.
Which publication-derived protocols can I compare?
No verified publication protocol was supplied; use only the deterministic recommended protocol.
Boster reagents

FSHB Western Blot Reagents

Human/Mouse-reactive FSHB Western blot reagents with authoritative product imagery.

Real WB data Western blot validation image for FSHB using PB9106; observed band 14.7 kDa
Anti-FSH beta/FSHB Antibody Picoband®
Cat # PB9106

Only image-backed, WB-validated Human/Mouse/Rat recommendations from the prepared catalog evidence are shown.

Source: prepared picoband-wb product evidence; each card retains its own SKU, URL, observed band, and authoritative WB image.

References

  1. UniProt P01225
  2. Human Protein Atlas — FSHB
  3. PB9106 product record
  4. PMC10486264 — Establishment of cell-lines stably expressing recombinant Japanese eel follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone using CHO-DG44 cells: fully induced ovarian development at different modes (Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023)
  5. PMC5338029 — The syndrome of central hypothyroidism and macroorchidism: IGSF1 controls TRHR and FSHB expression by differential modulation of pituitary TGFβ and Activin pathways (Scientific reports, 2017)