GATA4 / Transcription factor GATA-4 · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for GATA4

Real validated GATA4 Western blot protocols, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-GATA4 WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled September 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for GATA4: expected band ~44.6 kDa, hero antibody A00499-1, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable GATA4 Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~44.6 kDa, antibody A00499-1, controls and PMC citations. Open the full GATA4 WB guide →

GATA4 Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, validated protocols, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~44.6 kDa
Observed band ~54 kDa
Gel 10% (catalog A00499-1)
Positive control ⓘ Esophagus (IHC candidate; verify WB) +4 more
Negative control ⓘ Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM Methylated
Caveat Modification-state controls
Gene-set association MSigDB C7 membership
Isoform 2 isoform(s)
Section 1

Real Curated GATA4 Western Blot Protocols

The A00499-1 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysatehuman HepG2, human PC-3, human HUH7 (catalog A00499-1)
Gel %10% (catalog A00499-1)
Load30 ug; reducing conditions (catalog A00499-1)
Transfera nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes (catalog A00499-1)
Membranenitrocellulose membrane (catalog A00499-1)
Blocking5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT (catalog A00499-1)
Primary antibodyA00499-1 · 0.5 μg/mL (catalog A00499-1)
Primary incubationovernight at 4°C (catalog A00499-1)
Secondary antibodygoat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP, 1:5000 (catalog A00499-1)
Secondary incubation1.5 hour at RT (catalog A00499-1)
WashTBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each (catalog A00499-1)
DetectionECL (catalog A00499-1)
Section 2

What Is the Expected GATA4 Western Blot Band Size?

GATA4 is predicted at 44.6 kDa and observed at ~54 kDa in antibody QC blots; the cause of the difference is not established.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Band near 54 kDaEmpirical GATA4 band in reducing whole-cell lysates; its difference from the predicted mass is unexplained
Band near 44.6 kDaCandidate band near the UniProt predicted mass; confirm its identity
Multiple bandsIsoforms 1 and 2 are annotated, but their migration and resolution are unknown
Little or no band in a cytosolic fractionGATA4 is nuclear
💡Expected GATA4 appearanceUniProt predicts 44.6 kDa, while antibody QC reports a ~54 kDa band in reducing whole-cell lysates; the difference is unexplained, so confirm band identity with positive and knockdown controls.
How each factor affects band size
UniProt predicted mass44.6 kDa is the sequence-based estimate; the observed band is ~54 kDa
Alternative splicingCan alter protein length, but no isoform masses or migration differences are supplied
Isoform 1Its size relative to isoform 2 is unspecified
Isoform 2Its size relative to isoform 1 is unspecified
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
No band in lysateNuclear GATA4 may be poorly recoveredCheck a nuclear fraction alongside a positive whole-cell lysate
Band higher than expectedThe reported ~54 kDa band exceeds the 44.6 kDa prediction for an unknown reasonCheck the molecular-weight marker and confirm identity by GATA4 knockdown
Band lower than expectedAn alternative isoform is possible, but its migration is unreportedConfirm identity with GATA4 knockdown and an antibody to another epitope
Multiple bandsIsoforms 1 and 2 are annotated, but distinct bands are not establishedTest which bands decrease after GATA4 knockdown
Weak or no signalNuclear GATA4 may be dilute in whole-cell lysateTry nuclear enrichment and include a positive lysate

Sample controls for GATA4 Western blot

🧪HPA-IHC candidate guidance (verify in WB): For positive controls for GATA4 in Western blot, you can use esophagus, which HPA scores High for GATA4 expression.
Positive control: Esophagus (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Negative control: Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain such as Ponceau alongside the samples.
⚠️Feasibility: GATA4 is nuclear, so nuclear-enriched lysates may improve detection.

HPA tissue expression evidence for GATA4

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Esophagus squamous epithelial cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Heart muscle cardiomyocytes High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Ovary ovarian stroma cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Placenta trophoblastic cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Small intestine glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Adipose tissue adipocytes Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Adrenal gland glandular cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Appendix glandular cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Bone marrow hematopoietic cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Breast adipocytes Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Section 3

Advanced GATA4 Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for GATA4, answered from its protein features.

How should GATA4 band migration be interpreted?
Band shift · Use the separately labelled calculated mass and catalog-observed evidence above. A sequence annotation does not establish an observed migration shift. Verify target identity with orthogonal controls.
Could GATA4 isoforms produce separate bands?
Isoforms · UniProt lists isoforms 1 and 2. At canonical position 205, isoform 2 has LV in place of L, adding one residue. This small sequence difference does not establish that the isoforms resolve as separate bands.
Do annotated modifications prove a band shift?
PTM · The linked UniProt record describes protein features. A modification annotation alone does not demonstrate a visible shift; retain any condition or experimental qualifier attached to it.
Does this guide establish induction of GATA4?
Induction · No general induction response is established by this guide. A pathway or gene-set association is not evidence of induction in a particular specimen. Verify the relevant treatment and control in a target-specific experiment.
How should transfer be checked for GATA4?
Transfer · Standard workflow guidance: verify transfer efficiency for the intended target size before interpreting a weak signal. Use total-protein assessment and optimize transfer for the membrane, gel and apparatus; the labelled catalog values take precedence.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the A00499-1 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
What matters when quantifying GATA4 Western blot signal?
Quantitation · GATA4 is listed in the nucleus. Compare samples prepared with the same fractionation approach and normalize signals within that approach. If isoforms produce distinguishable signals, specify which band is quantified; the supplied features do not establish that they separate.
Why might GATA4 appear near 54 kDa instead of 44.6 kDa?
Interpretation · The supplied observed band is approximately 54 kDa, while the predicted mass is 44.6 kDa. The listed features do not establish the cause of this difference. Use the observed position as a reference, but confirm band identity independently.

UniProt lists N6-methyllysine at position 300, modified by EZH2. Position 300 uses the supplied UniProt coordinate convention; numbering in other sources may differ. This modification alone does not demonstrate a visible shift or explain the approximately 54 kDa band.

Isoform 2 changes canonical residue 205 from L to LV. If an antibody recognizes a sequence spanning that position, check its stated epitope and isoform coverage before interpreting unequal signals. The supplied features do not establish antibody specificity.

Compare them with the approximately 54 kDa observed band and consider the two listed isoforms. The supplied features list no glycosylation sites, signal peptide, or propeptide, so they provide no basis for assigning extra bands to those processes. Band position alone does not identify a band.
Boster reagents

GATA4 Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western blot analysis of GATA4 using anti-GATA4 antibody (A00499-1). Electrophoresis was performed on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel at 80V (Stacking gel) / 120V (Resolving gel) for 2 hours. The sample well of each lane was loaded with 30 ug of sample under reducing conditions. Lane 1: human HepG2 whole cell lysates, Lane 2: human PC-3 whole cell lysates, Lane 3: human HUH7 whole cell lysates, Lane 4: human 293T whole cell lysates, Lane 5: rat liver tissue lysates. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes. Blocked the membrane with 5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT. The membrane was incubated with rabbit anti-GATA4 antigen affinity purified polyclonal antibody (A00499-1) at 0.5 μg/mL overnight at 4°C, then washed with TBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each and probed with a goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP secondary antibody (Catalog # BA1054) at a dilution of 1:5000 for 1.5 hour at RT. The signal is developed using an ECL Plus Western Blotting Substrate (Catalog # AR1196-200) with Tanon 5200 system. A specific band was detected for GATA4 at approximately 54 kDa. The expected band size for GATA4 is at 45 kDa.
Anti-GATA4 Antibody Picoband®
Cat # A00499-1
Real WB data Western blot analysis of GATA4 using anti-GATA4 antibody (M00499-1). <br>
Electrophoresis was performed on a 5-20% SDS-PAGE gel at 70V (Stacking gel) / 90V (Resolving gel) for 2-3 hours. The sample well of each lane was loaded with 30 ug of sample under reducing conditions. <br>
Lane 1: human HepG2 whole cell lysates,<br>
Lane 2: human SH-SY5Y whole cell lysates,<br>
Lane 3: rat liver tissue lysates,<br>
Lane 4: mouse liver tissue lysates.<br>
After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes. Blocked the membrane with 5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT. The membrane was incubated with rabbit anti-GATA4 antigen affinity purified polyclonal antibody (Catalog # M00499-1) at 1:500 overnight at 4°C, then washed with TBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each and probed with a goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:5000 for 1.5 hour at RT. The signal is developed using an Enhanced Chemiluminescent detection (ECL) kit (Catalog # EK1002) with Tanon 5200 system. A specific band was detected for GATA4 at approximately 54 kDa. The expected band size for GATA4 is at 45 kDa.
Anti-GATA4 Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody
Cat # M00499-1

Both listed anti-GATA4 antibodies have Western blot images showing a band near 54 kDa, versus the stated 45 kDa expectation. Captions show specific human cell lines and rat liver; M00499-1 also shows mouse liver. These examples do not establish universal sample performance.

Which to pick: For mouse liver, M00499-1 has a matching image and lists mouse reactivity. Both antibodies have images for human HepG2 cells and rat liver. A00499-1 also shows PC-3, HUH7, and 293T cells; M00499-1 also shows SH-SY5Y cells.

Source: BosterBio GATA4 gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.