HELLS / Lymphoid-specific helicase · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for HELLS

Source-linked HELLS Western blot protocol options, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-HELLS WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled September 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for HELLS: expected band ~97.1 kDa, hero antibody A04702-1, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable HELLS Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~97.1 kDa, antibody A04702-1, controls and PMC citations. Open the full HELLS WB guide →

HELLS Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, source-linked protocol options, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~97.1 kDa
Observed band ~97 kDa
Gel 5–20% (catalog A04702-1)
Positive control ⓘ Lymph node (IHC candidate; verify WB) +4 more
Negative control ⓘ Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM Phosphorylated
Caveat Phosphorylation-state controls
Gene-set association MSigDB Hallmark membership
Isoform 9 isoform(s)
Section 1

Source-Linked HELLS Western Blot Protocol Options

The A04702-1 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysatehuman Hela, human K562, human PC-3, mouse thymus, mouse testis (catalog A04702-1)
Gel %5–20% (catalog A04702-1)
Load30 ug; reducing conditions (catalog A04702-1)
Transfera nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes (catalog A04702-1)
Membranenitrocellulose membrane (catalog A04702-1)
Blocking5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT (catalog A04702-1)
Primary antibodyA04702-1 · 0.5 μg/mL (catalog A04702-1)
Primary incubationovernight at 4°C (catalog A04702-1)
Secondary antibodygoat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP, 1:5000 (catalog A04702-1)
Secondary incubation1.5 hour at RT (catalog A04702-1)
WashTBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each (catalog A04702-1)
DetectionECL (catalog A04702-1)
Section 2

What Is the Expected HELLS Western Blot Band Size?

HELLS is predicted at 97.1 kDa and observed at ~97 kDa; the cause of any small difference is not established.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Band at ~97 kDaMatches the empirical HELLS band and its 97.1 kDa predicted mass
Single sharp band near 97 kDaConsistent with HELLS; its isoforms need not resolve separately
Additional discrete bandsCould represent HELLS isoforms, pending band-identity controls
Different band patterns across samplesCould reflect different isoforms, but their migration is not established
💡Expected HELLS appearanceHELLS has a predicted mass of 97.1 kDa and an empirical band at ~97 kDa; confirm band identity with an appropriate specificity control.
How each factor affects band size
UniProt predicted massPlaces HELLS near 97.1 kDa, consistent with the observed ~97 kDa band
Isoforms 1, 2, and 3May differ in apparent size; individual masses and migration are not supplied
Isoforms 4, 5, and 6May differ in apparent size; individual masses and migration are not supplied
Isoforms 7, 8, and 9May differ in apparent size; individual masses and migration are not supplied
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
No band in lysateNuclear, chromosome-associated HELLS may be poorly recoveredCheck a nuclear or chromatin-enriched fraction and a positive-control lysate
Band higher than expectedAn isoform or phosphorylation is possible, but the cause is unestablishedCompare with the ~97 kDa control band and verify specificity by HELLS depletion
Band lower than expectedAn isoform is possible, but its size is not suppliedVerify the band by HELLS depletion and compare antibody epitopes
Multiple bandsHELLS has nine annotated isoforms; their band positions are unknownUse HELLS depletion to identify specific bands
Weak or no signalLimited recovery of nuclear, chromosome-associated HELLS is possibleCheck fraction recovery and run a positive-control lysate

Sample controls for HELLS Western blot

🧪HPA-IHC candidate guidance (verify in WB): For positive controls for HELLS in Western blot, you can use lymph node tissue.
Positive control: Lymph node (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Negative control: Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain such as Ponceau alongside the samples.
⚠️Feasibility: HPA reports high expression in lymph node and no detection in adipose tissue, making tissue controls feasible.

HPA tissue expression evidence for HELLS

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Lymph node germinal center cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Rectum enterocytes High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Small intestine enterocytes High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Testis preleptotene spermatocytes High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Tonsil germinal center cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Adipose tissue adipocytes Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Adrenal gland glandular cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Breast adipocytes Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Cerebellum cells in granular layer Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Cerebral cortex endothelial cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Section 3

Advanced HELLS Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for HELLS, answered from its protein features.

How should HELLS band migration be interpreted?
Band shift · Use the separately labelled calculated mass and catalog-observed evidence above. A sequence annotation does not establish an observed migration shift. Verify target identity with orthogonal controls.
How might HELLS isoforms affect band size?
Isoforms · Nine isoforms are listed. Isoform 2 lacks residues 1–16; isoforms 3, 5, 6, and 4 have other deletions. Isoforms 7–9 lack large portions of the canonical sequence and could yield much smaller products. The features do not establish which isoforms are present in your sample.

Check the epitope against the canonical sequence and the isoform changes. An antibody targeting residues 783–838 cannot recognize isoforms 4 or 7–9 through that region; one targeting residues 1–16 cannot recognize isoform 2 through that region. Match the epitope to the isoforms you intend to measure.
Could phosphorylation shift the HELLS band?
PTM · UniProt lists phosphoserine at canonical positions 115, 503, and 515. These sites establish possible modification, but their presence alone does not demonstrate a visible shift or explain a measured mass difference. State explicitly if antibody or paper numbering uses a different sequence convention.
Does this guide establish induction of HELLS?
Induction · No general induction response is established by this guide. A pathway or gene-set association is not evidence of induction in a particular specimen. Verify the relevant treatment and control in a target-specific experiment.
How should transfer be checked for HELLS?
Transfer · Standard workflow guidance: verify transfer efficiency for the intended target size before interpreting a weak signal. Use total-protein assessment and optimize transfer for the membrane, gel and apparatus; the labelled catalog values take precedence.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the A04702-1 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
How should HELLS be quantified?
Quantitation · Standard workflow guidance: quantify only a validated target band within the linear exposure range. Use consistent sample preparation and loading, retain biological replicates, and avoid interpreting saturation or loading differences as regulation.
Does the observed HELLS band match its predicted mass?
Interpretation · The observed band near 97 kDa agrees with the 97.1 kDa predicted mass. Band position alone does not establish identity; consider antibody specificity and the listed isoforms when interpreting the signal.

Compare their positions and antibody epitope with the listed isoforms. Isoform 3 lacks residues 313–344, isoform 6 lacks 313–442, and isoform 9 lacks 130–838. These changes make smaller products plausible, but band size alone cannot identify an isoform or establish that a band is HELLS.

HELLS is listed in the nucleus and on chromosomes, closely associated with pericentric heterochromatin. Use a preparation that retains these compartments, and keep extraction conditions consistent across samples. A weak signal in a preparation lacking nuclear material is difficult to interpret.

Compare the same band or defined set of bands across samples, using consistent nuclear or chromosomal extraction. Because nine isoforms are listed, an antibody may measure only those retaining its epitope. Record which bands you quantify and avoid treating a change in one band as a change in every HELLS isoform.
Boster reagents

HELLS Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western blot analysis of HELLS using anti-HELLS antibody (A04702-1). Electrophoresis was performed on a 5-20% SDS-PAGE gel at 70V (Stacking gel) / 90V (Resolving gel) for 2-3 hours. The sample well of each lane was loaded with 30 ug of sample under reducing conditions. Lane 1: human Hela whole cell lysates, Lane 2: human K562 whole cell lysates, Lane 3: human PC-3 whole cell lysates, Lane 4: mouse thymus tissue lysates, Lane 5: mouse testis tissue lysates. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes. Blocked the membrane with 5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT. The membrane was incubated with rabbit anti-HELLS antigen affinity purified polyclonal antibody (Catalog # A04702-1) at 0.5 μg/mL overnight at 4°C, then washed with TBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each and probed with a goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:5000 for 1.5 hour at RT. The signal is developed using an Enhanced Chemiluminescent detection (ECL) kit (Catalog # EK1002) with Tanon 5200 system. A specific band was detected for HELLS at approximately 97 kDa. The expected band size for HELLS is at 97 kDa.
Anti-HELLS Antibody Picoband®
Cat # A04702-1

The catalog reports one anti-HELLS antibody for Western blotting, A04702-1, with stated human and mouse reactivity. Its WB image shows an approximately 97 kDa band in the named human cell and mouse tissue lysates; these examples do not establish performance in other samples.

Which to pick: A04702-1 is the only listed option. Its WB image includes HeLa, K562, and PC-3 cell lysates and mouse thymus and testis lysates, tested at 0.5 μg/mL under reducing conditions. Use those documented sample contexts to judge fit for your experiment.

Source: BosterBio HELLS gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.