KEL / Kell blood group glycoprotein · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for KEL

Source-linked KEL Western blot protocol options, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-KEL WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled September 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for KEL: expected band ~82.8 kDa, hero antibody A04711, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable KEL Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~82.8 kDa, antibody A04711, controls and PMC citations. Open the full KEL WB guide →

KEL Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, source-linked protocol options, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~82.8 kDa
Gel 8–10% (standard starting point)
Negative control ⓘ Suggested KO / knockdown lysate
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM Glycosylated + Phosphorylated
Caveat Modification-state controls
Gene-set association MSigDB Hallmark membership
Isoform 1 isoform(s)
Section 1

Source-Linked KEL Western Blot Protocol Options

The A04711 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysatemouse-heart cells (catalog A04711)
Gel %8–10% (standard starting point)
Load20–30 µg total protein per lane; optimize for abundance (standard starting point)
TransferStandard semi-dry transfer; verify efficiency (standard starting point)
Membrane0.45 µm PVDF (standard starting point)
Blocking5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST (standard starting point)
Primary antibodyA04711 · 1:1000 (catalog A04711)
Primary incubationOvernight at 4 °C (standard starting point)
Secondary antibody1:20000 (catalog A04711)
Secondary incubation1 h at room temperature (standard starting point)
Wash3 × 5 min in TBST (standard starting point)
DetectionECL; bracket exposures to avoid saturation (standard starting point)
Section 2

What Is the Expected KEL Western Blot Band Size?

KEL’s predicted polypeptide mass is 82.8 kDa; glycosylation and XK linkage may affect migration, but no empirical band size or visible shift is established.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Band near 82.8 kDaCompatible with the predicted KEL polypeptide mass; confirm identity with controls
Band above 82.8 kDaN-linked glycans could affect migration, but a visible shift is not established
Higher band under nonreducing conditionsCould represent disulfide-linked KEL with XK; its band size is not supplied
Weak band in a soluble fractionKEL is a membrane protein and may remain in the membrane fraction
💡Expected KEL appearanceKEL has a predicted polypeptide mass of 82.8 kDa, but no empirical band size is supplied; use reduction, glycosidase treatment, and band-identity controls to assess any differing migration.
How each factor affects band size
Predicted KEL polypeptide mass82.8 kDa before any apparent migration effects
N-linked glycosylation at Asn94Could increase apparent size if occupied; no shift is established
N-linked glycosylation at Asn115Could increase apparent size if occupied; no shift is established
N-linked glycosylation at Asn191 in KEL2 antigenCould increase apparent size if occupied; no shift is established
N-linked glycosylation at Asn345 and Asn627Could affect apparent size if occupied; no shift is established
Disulfide-linked heterodimer with XKCould produce a higher band under nonreducing conditions; its size is not supplied
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
No band in lysateKEL may be poorly recovered from the membraneCheck membrane extraction and probe a membrane fraction
Band higher than expectedN-linked glycans or disulfide-linked XK may affect migrationCompare glycosidase-treated and fully reduced samples
Band lower than expectedGlycan occupancy may vary, or the band may be unrelated to KELCompare glycosidase-treated samples and verify band identity
Broad smear instead of sharp bandVariable N-linked glycosylation is possibleCompare with glycosidase-treated samples and verify band identity
Multiple bandsKEL monomer and disulfide-linked KEL–XK could coexist after incomplete reductionCompare reducing and nonreducing lanes and verify band identity

Sample controls for KEL Western blot

🧪For positive controls for KEL in Western blot, you can use erythrocyte membranes, where UniProt places KEL; no HPA positive sample is supplied.
Positive control: No high/medium HPA tissue identified
Negative control: Suggested KO / knockdown lysate
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain alongside the samples.
⚠️Feasibility: Membrane-enriched samples are appropriate for KEL, but HPA data do not establish a tissue negative control.

HPA tissue expression evidence for KEL

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
No high/medium HPA tissues identified in the supplied evidence.

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
No lower-expression tissue rows available in the supplied evidence.
Section 3

Advanced KEL Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for KEL, answered from its protein features.

How should KEL band migration be interpreted?
Band shift · Use the separately labelled calculated mass and catalog-observed evidence above. A sequence annotation does not establish an observed migration shift. Verify target identity with orthogonal controls.
Could annotated KEL isoforms explain multiple bands?
Isoforms · Only one isoform is supplied, with no alternative sequence. The supplied features therefore do not support assigning separate bands to annotated isoforms. Check other feature-based possibilities, including glycosylation and the disulfide-linked XK heterodimer.
Which glycosylation sites matter when assessing a KEL band?
PTM · UniProt lists N-linked sites at Asn94, Asn115, Asn191, Asn345 and Asn627; Asn191 is annotated in the KEL2 antigen. These are UniProt coordinates. Record the band position before and after any glycosylation comparison rather than assuming a particular shift.

UniProt annotates phosphoserine at position 7. That site alone does not establish a visible band shift or identify an extra band. Use UniProt numbering when comparing the site with antibody or paper coordinates.
Does this guide establish induction of KEL?
Induction · No general induction response is established by this guide. A pathway or gene-set association is not evidence of induction in a particular specimen. Verify the relevant treatment and control in a target-specific experiment.
What transfer method to use for KEL Western blot?
Transfer · KEL is an 82.8 kDa single-pass membrane protein. Choose transfer conditions that recover a protein of this size from the gel, then check the post-transfer gel and membrane for incomplete transfer. The supplied features do not specify one transfer method.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the A04711 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
How should KEL Western blot signal be quantified?
Quantitation · KEL spans the erythrocyte membrane and is attached to the underlying cytoskeleton. Compare samples using consistent membrane preparation and loading, and measure bands within the detection system’s linear range. Define the band being measured before comparing intensities.
Should KEL migrate at its predicted 82.8 kDa?
Interpretation · 82.8 kDa is the predicted mass; no observed band position is supplied. KEL has five annotated N-linked glycosylation sites, but those annotations alone cannot establish a visible shift or explain a measured difference.

KEL forms a disulfide-linked heterodimer with XK and has six annotated disulfide bonds. Compare reducing and nonreducing samples when assessing a higher band. The five N-linked sites are also relevant to migration, but no observed band position is supplied, so these features cannot identify an unexpected band by themselves.
Boster reagents

KEL Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western Blot analysis of mouse-heart cells using CD238 Polyclonal Antibody diluted at 1:1000. Secondary antibody was diluted at 1:20000
Anti-CD238 KEL Antibody
Cat # A04711

A04711 is an anti-KEL (CD238) antibody listed for human and mouse reactivity. Its supplied Western blot image shows mouse-heart cells with primary antibody at 1:1000 and secondary antibody at 1:20000. No human WB example is supplied.

Which to pick: A04711 is the only listed option. It has a mouse-heart-cell WB image; human reactivity is listed, but no human WB example is provided.

Source: BosterBio KEL gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.

References

  1. UniProt Consortium. UniProt entry P23276.
  2. Human Protein Atlas. KEL tissue expression.
  3. PMC6004516 — target-verified WB comparison