LIAS / Lipoyl synthase, mitochondrial · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for LIAS

Real validated LIAS Western blot protocols, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-LIAS WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled September 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for LIAS: expected band ~41.9 kDa, hero antibody A08974-1, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable LIAS Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~41.9 kDa, antibody A08974-1, controls and PMC citations. Open the full LIAS WB guide →

LIAS Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, validated protocols, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~41.9 kDa
Observed band ~39 kDa
Gel 12% (catalog A08974-1)
Positive control ⓘ Cerebellum (IHC candidate; verify WB) +4 more
Negative control ⓘ Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM —
Caveat Observed below predicted
Gene-set association MSigDB C7 membership
Isoform 3 isoform(s)
Section 1

Real Curated LIAS Western Blot Protocols

The A08974-1 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysatehuman HepG2, human Raji, human K562 (catalog A08974-1)
Gel %12% (catalog A08974-1)
Load30 ug; reducing conditions (catalog A08974-1)
Transfera nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes (catalog A08974-1)
Membranenitrocellulose membrane (catalog A08974-1)
Blocking5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT (catalog A08974-1)
Primary antibodyA08974-1 · 1:1000 (catalog A08974-1)
Primary incubationovernight at 4°C (catalog A08974-1)
Secondary antibodygoat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP, 1:5000 (catalog A08974-1)
Secondary incubation1.5 hour at RT (catalog A08974-1)
WashTBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each (catalog A08974-1)
DetectionECL (catalog A08974-1)
Section 2

What Is the Expected LIAS Western Blot Band Size?

LIAS is predicted at 41.9 kDa and observed near 39 kDa in reducing blots; the cause of the difference is not established.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Band at ~39 kDaEmpirical LIAS band in reducing whole-cell blots; confirm identity with appropriate controls
Band near 41.9 kDaNear the UniProt predicted mass; identity still needs confirmation
Several bands at different positionsCould include isoforms 1, 2, and 3 if their migration differs; distinct bands are not established
Weak band in mitochondrial-poor lysateLIAS is mitochondrial, so sample composition may limit its signal
💡Expected LIAS appearanceUniProt predicts 41.9 kDa, while reducing whole-cell blots show a ~39 kDa LIAS band; the cause of the difference is unestablished, so confirm band identity with appropriate controls.
How each factor affects band size
UniProt predicted mass of 41.9 kDaProvides a reference; the empirical band is ~39 kDa, with no established cause for the difference
Isoform 1Its individual mass and migration are not supplied
Isoform 2Alternative splicing could change apparent size, but its migration is not supplied
Isoform 3Alternative splicing could change apparent size, but its migration is not supplied
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
No band in lysateMitochondrial LIAS may be scarce in the sampled lysateCheck sample loading and compare with a mitochondria-enriched preparation
Band higher than expectedNo supplied LIAS feature establishes a higher-mass bandCheck molecular-weight markers and confirm identity with knockdown or an independent antibody
Band lower than expectedThe observed ~39 kDa band is below the 41.9 kDa prediction; its cause is unknownCompare with the empirical ~39 kDa reference and verify identity by knockdown or an independent antibody
Multiple bandsIsoforms 1, 2, and 3 exist, but distinct migration is unestablishedTest band identity with isoform-specific evidence or LIAS knockdown
Weak or no signalLIAS is mitochondrial, and its abundance may be low in the sampleCheck loading and enrichment using a mitochondrial marker

Sample controls for LIAS Western blot

🧪HPA-IHC candidate guidance (verify in WB): For positive controls for LIAS in Western blot, you can use cerebellum tissue, which HPA reports as positive.
Positive control: Cerebellum (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Negative control: Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain such as Ponceau alongside the samples.
⚠️Feasibility: LIAS is mitochondrial, so mitochondrial enrichment may improve its signal in tissue lysate.

HPA tissue expression evidence for LIAS

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Cerebellum Purkinje cells Medium Protein (IHC) HPA →
Cerebral cortex neuronal cells Medium Protein (IHC) HPA →
Colon glandular cells Medium Protein (IHC) HPA →
Duodenum glandular cells Medium Protein (IHC) HPA →
Epididymis glandular cells Medium Protein (IHC) HPA →

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Adipose tissue adipocytes Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Bone marrow hematopoietic cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Breast adipocytes Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Cervix glandular cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Esophagus squamous epithelial cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Section 3

Advanced LIAS Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for LIAS, answered from its protein features.

How should LIAS band migration be interpreted?
Band shift · Use the separately labelled calculated mass and catalog-observed evidence above. A sequence annotation does not establish an observed migration shift. Verify target identity with orthogonal controls.
Could LIAS isoforms produce different bands?
Isoforms · UniProt lists three isoforms. Isoform 3 lacks residues 203–245, and isoform 2 lacks residues 323–372, so they may differ in mass. These sequence differences do not establish which isoforms are expressed or detectable in your sample.

Check the antibody epitope against all three isoforms. An epitope within UniProt residues 203–245 is absent from isoform 3; one within residues 323–372 is absent from isoform 2. These are UniProt coordinates and may differ from antibody documentation numbering.
Should LIAS bands be interpreted as glycosylated or modified forms?
PTM · The supplied features list no glycosylation sites or modified residues. Do not assign an extra band or the 39 kDa apparent mass to a specific modification from these data alone.
Does this guide establish induction of LIAS?
Induction · No general induction response is established by this guide. A pathway or gene-set association is not evidence of induction in a particular specimen. Verify the relevant treatment and control in a target-specific experiment.
How should transfer be checked for LIAS?
Transfer · Standard workflow guidance: verify transfer efficiency for the intended target size before interpreting a weak signal. Use total-protein assessment and optimize transfer for the membrane, gel and apparatus; the labelled catalog values take precedence.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the A08974-1 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
How should LIAS be quantified if multiple bands appear?
Quantitation · Choose a band whose identity is supported by controls, then quantify that band consistently across samples. Record whether the antibody epitope covers all three isoforms; the listed sequence differences could affect which isoforms it detects.
Why might LIAS appear near 39 kDa instead of 41.9 kDa?
Interpretation · The reported apparent band is about 39 kDa, while the predicted mass is 41.9 kDa. LIAS is mitochondrial and has a transit peptide keyword, but these features alone do not establish the cause of the difference. Use the reported band as a reference and verify its identity with an appropriate control.

LIAS is annotated as mitochondrial. Comparing a mitochondrial fraction with an appropriate control fraction may help assess whether a candidate band follows the expected localization. Localization alone does not prove band identity.

Compare their apparent sizes with the reported ~39 kDa band and consider the listed isoform deletions. Check antibody epitope coverage and whether bands follow LIAS mitochondrial localization. The supplied features do not establish that any unexpected band is a specific isoform.
Boster reagents

LIAS Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western blot analysis of LIAS using anti-LIAS antibody (A08974-1). Electrophoresis was performed on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel at 80V (Stacking gel) / 120V (Resolving gel) for 2 hours. The sample well of each lane was loaded with 30 ug of sample under reducing conditions. Lane 1: human HepG2 whole cell lysates, Lane 2: human Raji whole cell lysates, Lane 3: human K562 whole cell lysates, Lane 4: human U251 whole cell lysates, Lane 5: rat brain tissue lysates, Lane 6: rat liver tissue lysates, Lane 7: mouse brain tissue lysates, Lane 8: mouse liver tissue lysates. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes. Blocked the membrane with 5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT. The membrane was incubated with rabbit anti-LIAS antigen affinity purified polyclonal antibody (A08974-1) at 1:1000 overnight at 4°C, then washed with TBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each and probed with a goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:5000 for 1.5 hour at RT. The signal is developed using an ECL Plus Western Blotting Substrate (Catalog # AR1196-200) with Tanon 5200 system. A specific band was detected for LIAS at approximately 39 kDa. The expected band size for LIAS is at 42 kDa.
Anti-LIAS Antibody Picoband®
Cat # A08974-1

The listed anti-LIAS rabbit polyclonal antibody has a Western blot image using human cell lysates and rat and mouse brain and liver lysates. The reported band is approximately 39 kDa, versus an expected 42 kDa. Evidence is limited to this product caption.

Which to pick: A08974-1 is the only listed option. It reports human, mouse, and rat reactivity and includes a Western blot image with samples from all three species. Use the caption’s tested samples and conditions to judge fit for your experiment.

Source: BosterBio LIAS gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.