MLXIPL / Carbohydrate-responsive element-binding protein · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for MLXIPL

Source-linked MLXIPL Western blot protocol options, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-MLXIPL WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled September 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for MLXIPL: expected band ~93.1 kDa, hero antibody A03145, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable MLXIPL Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~93.1 kDa, antibody A03145, controls and PMC citations. Open the full MLXIPL WB guide →

MLXIPL Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, source-linked protocol options, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~93.1 kDa
Gel 8–10% (standard starting point)
Negative control ⓘ Suggested KO / knockdown lysate
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM Phosphorylated
Caveat Phosphorylation-state controls
Gene-set association MSigDB C7 membership
Isoform 6 isoform(s)
Section 1

Source-Linked MLXIPL Western Blot Protocol Options

The A03145 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysateextracts of various cell lines, (catalog A03145)
Gel %8–10% (standard starting point)
Load20–30 µg total protein per lane; optimize for abundance (standard starting point)
TransferStandard semi-dry transfer; verify efficiency (standard starting point)
Membrane0.45 µm PVDF (standard starting point)
BlockingBlocking buffer: 3% nonfat dry milk in TBST (catalog A03145)
Primary antibodyA03145 · 1:1000 (catalog A03145)
Primary incubationOvernight at 4 °C (standard starting point)
Secondary antibodyGoat Anti-Rabbit IgG, 1:10000 (catalog A03145)
Secondary incubation1 h at room temperature (standard starting point)
Wash3 × 5 min in TBST (standard starting point)
DetectionECL (catalog A03145)
Section 2

What Is the Expected MLXIPL Western Blot Band Size?

MLXIPL is predicted at 93.1 kDa; isoforms and phosphorylation could affect migration, but no empirical band or feature-dependent shift is demonstrated.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Band near 93.1 kDacandidate MLXIPL band at its predicted mass; confirm identity with controls
Close doublet near the main bandcould reflect phosphorylation at documented sites; a mobility effect is unproven
Several bands at different positionscould reflect MLXIPL isoforms 1 through 6; distinct migration is unproven
Band distribution differs between cytoplasmic and nuclear fractionsconsistent with glucose-dependent movement between cytoplasm and nucleus
💡Expected MLXIPL appearanceMLXIPL has a predicted mass of 93.1 kDa, but no empirical band position is supplied; use antibody specificity and MLXIPL depletion controls to identify any detected band.
How each factor affects band size
UniProt predicted masssets a 93.1 kDa reference for the full-length sequence, not a measured band
Isoforms 1 and 2may differ in apparent mass; their sizes and ordering are unknown
Isoforms 3 and 4may differ in apparent mass; their sizes and ordering are unknown
Isoforms 5 and 6may differ in apparent mass; their sizes and ordering are unknown
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
Band higher than expectedphosphorylation may affect migration, but the cause of a higher band is unestablishedcompare phosphatase-treated material and confirm identity with MLXIPL depletion
Band lower than expectedan alternative isoform is possible; no isoform mass is suppliedconfirm identity with MLXIPL depletion and an antibody against another region
Multiple bandssix isoforms or different phosphorylation states are possiblecompare isoform-specific expression where available and test phosphatase sensitivity
Broad smear instead of sharp bandvariable phosphorylation is possible, but a smear is not established for MLXIPLcompare phosphatase-treated material and verify the signal with MLXIPL depletion
Weak or no signalMLXIPL distribution between cytoplasm and nucleus changes with glucosecheck both fractions under the sampled glucose condition and verify antibody performance with a positive control

Sample controls for MLXIPL Western blot

🧪For positive controls for MLXIPL in Western blot, you can use a validated MLXIPL-expressing sample; the supplied HPA data identify no positive tissue or cell line.
Positive control: No high/medium HPA tissue identified
Negative control: Suggested KO / knockdown lysate
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain alongside the samples.
⚠️Feasibility: HPA provides no tissue expression data, so positive and negative samples need experimental validation.

HPA tissue expression evidence for MLXIPL

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
No high/medium HPA tissues identified in the supplied evidence.

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
No lower-expression tissue rows available in the supplied evidence.
Section 3

Advanced MLXIPL Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for MLXIPL, answered from its protein features.

How should MLXIPL band migration be interpreted?
Band shift · Use the separately labelled calculated mass and catalog-observed evidence above. A sequence annotation does not establish an observed migration shift. Verify target identity with orthogonal controls.
Which MLXIPL isoforms could produce different bands?
Isoforms · Six isoforms are listed. Relative to the canonical sequence, isoform 5 lacks residues 576–852 and replaces 558–575; isoform 6 lacks 176–268 and 816–852. Isoforms 2 and 4 lack 687–705, while 3 and 4 lack 647–648. These sequence differences could affect band position; the supplied record gives no observed positions.
Which MLXIPL phosphorylation sites should I consider?
PTM · The supplied UniProt coordinates are phosphoserines 20, 23, 25, 29, 196, 556, 602, 614 and 631, plus phosphothreonine 27. Ser556 is annotated as phosphorylated by AMPK. Check whether your antibody recognizes the relevant region; phosphorylation alone does not establish a visible band shift. UniProt coordinates may differ from antibody or paper numbering.
Does this guide establish induction of MLXIPL?
Induction · No general induction response is established by this guide. A pathway or gene-set association is not evidence of induction in a particular specimen. Verify the relevant treatment and control in a target-specific experiment.
How should transfer be checked for MLXIPL?
Transfer · Standard workflow guidance: verify transfer efficiency for the intended target size before interpreting a weak signal. Use total-protein assessment and optimize transfer for the membrane, gel and apparatus; the labelled catalog values take precedence.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the A03145 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
How should I quantify MLXIPL across glucose conditions?
Quantitation · Quantify matched sample types and keep cytoplasmic and nuclear measurements distinct. MLXIPL can redistribute between these compartments with glucose in hepatocytes, so a change in one fraction alone does not establish a change in total abundance. Report which fraction and glucose condition each measurement represents.
Should MLXIPL run at its predicted 93.1 kDa?
Interpretation · 93.1 kDa is the predicted mass of the canonical 852-residue sequence. No observed band position is supplied. Isoform changes and phosphorylation are documented, but their presence alone does not establish a visible shift or explain any difference from 93.1 kDa.

UniProt annotates phosphorylation of Ser556 by AMPK. If studying AMPK-related conditions, track the same MLXIPL band consistently and interpret a mobility change cautiously: this annotation does not show that phosphorylation at Ser556 creates a resolvable shift. Ser556 uses the supplied UniProt coordinate.

The supplied location note says MLXIPL is mainly cytoplasmic in hepatocytes under low glucose and moves into the nucleus under high glucose. Record glucose conditions and compare matched cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions when interpreting band intensity. The note describes localization, not a demonstrated change in total protein abundance.

Compare bands with the documented isoform changes, especially the large deletions in isoforms 5 and 6. The smaller deletions in isoforms 2–4 and listed phosphorylation sites may also be relevant, but the supplied features do not establish their gel positions. No empirical band positions are available to identify an unexpected band from migration alone.
Boster reagents

MLXIPL Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western blot analysis of extracts of various cell lines, using MLXIPL antibody at 1:1000 dilution. Secondary antibody: HRP Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG at 1:10000 dilution. Lysates/proteins: 25ug per lane. Blocking buffer: 3% nonfat dry milk in TBST. Detection: ECL Basic Kit . Exposure time: 10s.
Anti-MLXIPL Antibody
Cat # A03145

The catalog reports one anti-MLXIPL antibody for Western blotting, A03145, with stated Human and Mouse reactivity. Its WB image uses cell-line extracts at 25 µg per lane and a 1:1000 primary dilution; the caption does not identify the cell lines or establish species-specific validation.

Which to pick: A03145 is the only listed option and has a WB image. Start with the reported 1:1000 primary dilution, then confirm performance in your own sample.

Source: BosterBio MLXIPL gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.