NEFM / Neurofilament medium polypeptide · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for NEFM

Source-linked NEFM Western blot protocol options, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-NEFM WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled September 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for NEFM: expected band ~102.5 kDa, hero antibody A06821-2, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable NEFM Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~102.5 kDa, antibody A06821-2, controls and PMC citations. Open the full NEFM WB guide →

NEFM Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, source-linked protocol options, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~102.5 kDa
Observed band ~160 kDa
Gel 8% (catalog A06821-2)
Positive control ⓘ Caudate (IHC candidate; verify WB) +4 more
Negative control ⓘ Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM Glycosylated + Phosphorylated
Caveat Modification-state controls
Gene-set association MSigDB C7 membership
Isoform 2 isoform(s)
Section 1

Source-Linked NEFM Western Blot Protocol Options

The A06821-2 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysatehuman 293T, human SH-SY5Y, rat brain, mouse brain (catalog A06821-2)
Gel %8% (catalog A06821-2)
Load30 ug; reducing conditions (catalog A06821-2)
Transfera nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes (catalog A06821-2)
Membranenitrocellulose membrane (catalog A06821-2)
Blocking5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT (catalog A06821-2)
Primary antibodyA06821-2 · 0.5 μg/mL (catalog A06821-2)
Primary incubationovernight at 4°C (catalog A06821-2)
Secondary antibodygoat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP, 1:5000 (catalog A06821-2)
Secondary incubation1.5 hour at RT (catalog A06821-2)
WashTBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each (catalog A06821-2)
DetectionECL (catalog A06821-2)
Section 2

What Is the Expected NEFM Western Blot Band Size?

NEFM is predicted at 102.5 kDa but observed near 160 kDa in antibody QC; the cause of the difference is not established.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Band near 160 kDaEmpirical NEFM band in reducing lysates; the cause of its migration is unestablished
Band near 102.5 kDaNear the sequence-predicted mass; identity requires confirmation
Multiple bandsIsoforms 1 and 2 could contribute, but distinct migration is unproven
Single band without a clear glycosylation shiftO-linked GlcNAc at Thr47 and Thr431 does not establish a visible shift
💡Expected NEFM appearanceUniProt predicts 102.5 kDa, while antibody QC shows a band near 160 kDa in reducing lysates; its higher apparent mass is unexplained, so confirm identity with knockdown or an independent antibody.
How each factor affects band size
UniProt predicted massSequence-based mass is 102.5 kDa; the observed band is near 160 kDa
O-linked GlcNAc at Thr47May modify apparent migration; no visible shift is established
O-linked GlcNAc at Thr431May modify apparent migration; no visible shift is established
Isoforms 1 and 2Could differ in size, but their relative masses and separation are unknown
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
No band in lysateCytoskeletal NEFM may be poorly recovered from the sampled lysateCheck the insoluble fraction and include a brain lysate positive control
Band higher than expectedThe observed band near 160 kDa exceeds the 102.5 kDa sequence prediction; the cause is unknownCompare with the QC band and confirm identity by knockdown or an independent antibody
Band lower than expectedAn isoform may differ in size, but its mass is unknownConfirm identity by knockdown or an independent antibody
Multiple bandsIsoforms 1 and 2 are annotated, though distinct bands are unprovenCompare bands after knockdown and with an independent antibody
Weak or no signalNEFM is localized to the cytoskeleton, axons and perikarya, so abundance may depend on the sampleUse an appropriate brain or neuronal positive control and check lysate loading

Sample controls for NEFM Western blot

🧪HPA-IHC candidate guidance (verify in WB): For positive controls for NEFM in Western blot, you can use caudate tissue lysate, where HPA reports high expression.
Positive control: Caudate (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Negative control: Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain alongside the samples.
⚠️Feasibility: Caudate is a strong positive choice, while HPA reports no detectable NEFM in adipose tissue.

HPA tissue expression evidence for NEFM

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Caudate neuronal cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Cerebellum processes in granular layer High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Cerebral cortex neuropil Medium Protein (IHC) HPA →
Colon peripheral nerve/ganglion Medium Protein (IHC) HPA →
Placenta decidual cells Medium Protein (IHC) HPA →

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Adipose tissue adipocytes Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Adrenal gland glandular cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Appendix glandular cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Bone marrow hematopoietic cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Breast adipocytes Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Section 3

Advanced NEFM Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for NEFM, answered from its protein features.

How should NEFM band migration be interpreted?
Band shift · Use the separately labelled calculated mass and catalog-observed evidence above. A sequence annotation does not establish an observed migration shift. Verify target identity with orthogonal controls.
How might the two NEFM isoforms affect band interpretation?
Isoforms · Isoform 2 lacks residues 1–376 of the canonical isoform, so it could yield a distinct band. Do not assign a band to either isoform by apparent size alone. Check whether the antibody recognizes a region present in both isoforms or within the missing segment.

Choose an epitope beyond canonical residue 376 if detection of both isoforms is the goal. Isoform 2 lacks canonical residues 1–376, so an antibody restricted to that segment would miss it. Confirm the antibody’s stated epitope and isoform reactivity before comparing bands.
Which phosphorylation sites are useful when investigating band changes?
PTM · UniProt annotates phosphorylation at canonical positions Ser-30, Ser-99, Ser-226, Tyr-320, Ser-346, and numerous later sites, including Ser-545, Ser-553, Ser-558, Ser-559, and Thr-571. Compare matched samples with and without phosphatase treatment to test whether phosphorylation contributes to a change. A listed site does not guarantee a visible shift.

Quantify each with an antibody validated for the intended target: total NEFM or a specified phosphorylated site. NEFM has multiple annotated phosphorylation sites, so a signal from one site does not measure phosphorylation across the protein. Compare like bands and like sample conditions, and state which canonical site the phospho measurement addresses.
Does this guide establish induction of NEFM?
Induction · No general induction response is established by this guide. A pathway or gene-set association is not evidence of induction in a particular specimen. Verify the relevant treatment and control in a target-specific experiment.
How should transfer be checked for NEFM?
Transfer · Standard workflow guidance: verify transfer efficiency for the intended target size before interpreting a weak signal. Use total-protein assessment and optimize transfer for the membrane, gel and apparatus; the labelled catalog values take precedence.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the A06821-2 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
How should NEFM be quantified?
Quantitation · Standard workflow guidance: quantify only a validated target band within the linear exposure range. Use consistent sample preparation and loading, retain biological replicates, and avoid interpreting saturation or loading differences as regulation.
Why does NEFM appear near 160 kDa instead of 102.5 kDa?
Interpretation · 102.5 kDa is the predicted mass, while about 160 kDa is the supplied apparent Western blot band. NEFM has many annotated phosphorylation sites and two O-linked GlcNAc sites, but those features alone do not establish the cause of the difference. Use the observed band as a reference and verify its identity experimentally.

UniProt lists O-linked GlcNAc at threonines 47 and 431 in canonical NEFM. These sites establish that NEFM can be modified, but do not predict a separate visible band or explain the approximately 160 kDa apparent mass. Interpret any additional band with independent evidence.

Consider isoform 2, which lacks canonical residues 1–376, alongside modification-dependent changes or antibody cross-reactivity. NEFM also forms heterodimers with NEFL and INA in vitro, but that annotation alone cannot identify a Western blot band. Check antibody epitope, sample preparation, and band identity before assigning a cause.
Boster reagents

NEFM Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western blot analysis of NF-M/NEFM using anti-NF-M/NEFM antibody (A06821-2). Electrophoresis was performed on a 8% SDS-PAGE gel at 80V (Stacking gel) / 120V (Resolving gel) for 2 hours. The sample well of each lane was loaded with 30 ug of sample under reducing conditions. Lane 1: human 293T whole cell lysates, Lane 2: human SH-SY5Y whole cell lysates, Lane 3: rat brain tissue lysates, Lane 4: mouse brain tissue lysates. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes. Blocked the membrane with 5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT. The membrane was incubated with rabbit anti-NF-M/NEFM antigen affinity purified polyclonal antibody (A06821-2) at 0.5 μg/mL overnight at 4°C, then washed with TBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each and probed with a goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:5000 for 1.5 hour at RT. The signal is developed using an ECL Plus Western Blotting Substrate (Catalog # AR1196-200) with Tanon 5200 system. A specific band was detected for NF-M/NEFM at approximately 160 kDa. The expected band size for NF-M/NEFM is at 102 kDa.
Anti-NF-M/NEFM Antibody Picoband®
Cat # A06821-2
Real WB data Western blot analysis of NF-M/NEFM using anti-NF-M/NEFM antibody (M06821). Electrophoresis was performed on a 8% SDS-PAGE gel at 80V (Stacking gel) / 120V (Resolving gel) for 2 hours. The sample well of each lane was loaded with 30 ug of sample under reducing conditions. Lane 1: human 293T whole cell lysates, Lane 2: human SH-SY5Y whole cell lysates. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes. Blocked the membrane with 5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT. The membrane was incubated with rabbit anti-NF-M/NEFM antigen affinity purified monoclonal antibody (M06821) at 1:500 overnight at 4°C, then washed with TBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each and probed with a goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:5000 for 1.5 hour at RT. The signal is developed using an ECL Plus Western Blotting Substrate (Catalog # AR1196-200) with Tanon 5200 system. A specific band was detected for NF-M/NEFM at approximately 160 kDa. The expected band size for NF-M/NEFM is at 102 kDa.
Anti-NEFM/Nf M Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody
Cat # M06821

Two the supplier anti-NEFM antibodies have Western blot images. Both captions report a band near 160 kDa, although the expected size is 102 kDa. The images show tested lysates under the stated conditions; they do not establish broader validation.

Which to pick: Choose A06821-2 for the illustrated human cell and rat or mouse brain lysates. M06821 has an image for human 293T and SH-SY5Y lysates; pig and rat are listed as reactive, but neither appears in its image.

Source: BosterBio NEFM gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.