This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.
- Table of Contents
Real validated PGD Western blot protocols, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-PGD WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.
Expected bands, validated protocols, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.
| Expected band | ~53.1 kDa | |
| Gel | 12–15% (standard starting point) | |
| Positive control | Bone marrow (IHC candidate; verify WB) +4 more | |
| Negative control | Caudate (IHC candidate; verify WB) |
| PTM | Phosphorylated + Acetylated | |
| Caveat | Modification-state controls | |
| Gene-set association | MSigDB Hallmark membership | |
| Isoform | 2 isoform(s) |
The M01623-1 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.
| Sample / lysate | (1) 293 cell lysate; (2) Mouse kidney lysate; (3) Rat kidney lysate (catalog M01623-1) |
| Gel % | 12–15% (standard starting point) |
| Load | 20–30 µg total protein per lane; optimize for abundance (standard starting point) |
| Transfer | Standard semi-dry transfer; verify efficiency (standard starting point) |
| Membrane | 0.45 µm PVDF (standard starting point) |
| Blocking | 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST (standard starting point) |
| Primary antibody | M01623-1; use the WB datasheet starting dilution (standard starting point) |
| Primary incubation | Overnight at 4 °C (standard starting point) |
| Secondary antibody | Species-matched HRP conjugate at validated dilution (standard starting point) |
| Secondary incubation | 1 h at room temperature (standard starting point) |
| Wash | 3 × 5 min in TBST (standard starting point) |
| Detection | ECL; bracket exposures to avoid saturation (standard starting point) |
PGD has a predicted 53.1 kDa monomer; its homodimer and isoforms could affect bands, but their visible migration is not demonstrated.
| Band near 53.1 kDa | Consistent with the predicted PGD monomer; confirm identity with band controls. |
| Band near 106 kDa under nonreducing conditions | Could reflect the PGD homodimer if it survives electrophoresis. |
| Several bands near the monomer region | Isoforms 1 and 2 could contribute, but distinct migration is unproven. |
| Single band near 53.1 kDa despite two isoforms | The isoforms may not resolve into separate bands. |
| Predicted PGD monomer mass | Sets a reference near 53.1 kDa, not a measured migration position. |
| PGD homodimer | Could appear near twice the monomer mass if it remains intact during electrophoresis. |
| Splice isoform 1 | Its mass relative to isoform 2 is not supplied; distinct migration is unproven. |
| Splice isoform 2 | Its mass relative to isoform 1 is not supplied; distinct migration is unproven. |
| Situation | Likely cause | Next action |
|---|---|---|
| Band higher than expected | The PGD homodimer may persist during sample preparation. | Compare reducing and nonreducing preparations and confirm band identity. |
| Band lower than expected | An isoform or protein breakdown is possible, but no smaller PGD mass is supplied. | Check sample integrity and confirm the band with PGD knockdown or an independent antibody. |
| Multiple bands | The two isoforms or residual homodimer could contribute; their migration is unverified. | Compare reducing conditions and use band-identity controls. |
| Weak or no signal | PGD detection or sample loading may be inadequate. | Check lysate loading and antibody performance with a positive control. |
| Fragments below expected size | Sample proteolysis is possible; no PGD cleavage product is specified. | Prepare fresh lysate with protease inhibitors and confirm fragment identity. |
Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.
| Tissue | Cell type | Level | Evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bone marrow | hematopoietic cells | High | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Esophagus | squamous epithelial cells | High | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Gallbladder | glandular cells | High | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Lung | macrophages | High | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Spleen | cells in red pulp | High | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Tissue | Cell type | Level | Evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caudate | glial cells | Not detected | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Heart muscle | cardiomyocytes | Not detected | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Hippocampus | glial cells | Not detected | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Skeletal muscle | myocytes | Not detected | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Smooth muscle | smooth muscle cells | Not detected | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for PGD, answered from its protein features.
Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.
Both listed anti-PGD antibodies have Western blot images and reported human, mouse, and rat reactivity. M01623-1 was shown with 293, mouse kidney, and rat kidney lysates. A01623-3 was shown with listed cell and tissue lysates. These examples do not establish broader validation.
Which to pick: Choose M01623-1 for a closer match to 293 or kidney lysates. Choose A01623-3 for a closer match to its listed human cell lines, rat liver or PC-12, or mouse RAW264.7; its caption also reports a band near 48 kDa and detailed conditions.