PIP / Prolactin-inducible protein · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for PIP

Real validated PIP Western blot protocols, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-PIP WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled September 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for PIP: expected band ~16.6 kDa, hero antibody M04543-2, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable PIP Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~16.6 kDa, antibody M04543-2, controls and PMC citations. Open the full PIP WB guide →

PIP Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, validated protocols, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~16.6 kDa
Gel 15% (standard starting point)
Positive control ⓘ Salivary gland (IHC candidate; verify WB) +1 more
Negative control ⓘ Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM Glycosylated + Cleaved
Caveat Modification-state controls
Gene-set association MSigDB C7 membership
Isoform 1 isoform(s)
Section 1

Real Curated PIP Western Blot Protocols

The M04543-2 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysateT47D cell lysate (catalog M04543-2)
Gel %15% (standard starting point)
Load20–30 µg total protein per lane; optimize for abundance (standard starting point)
TransferShort semi-dry transfer; verify retention (standard starting point)
Membrane0.2 µm PVDF (standard starting point)
Blocking5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST (standard starting point)
Primary antibodyM04543-2; use the WB datasheet starting dilution (standard starting point)
Primary incubationOvernight at 4 °C (standard starting point)
Secondary antibodySpecies-matched HRP conjugate at validated dilution (standard starting point)
Secondary incubation1 h at room temperature (standard starting point)
Wash3 × 5 min in TBST (standard starting point)
DetectionECL; bracket exposures to avoid saturation (standard starting point)
Section 2

What Is the Expected PIP Western Blot Band Size?

PIP has a predicted 16.6 kDa precursor; signal peptide cleavage and Asn105 glycosylation may affect migration, but no empirical band or feature-specific shift is established.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Band near 16.6 kDaMay represent the full-length precursor; confirm band identity
Band below the precursor positionMay reflect removal of the 1–28 signal peptide
Band above an unglycosylated formCould reflect N-linked glycosylation at Asn105; a visible shift is unproven
Little or no band in whole-cell lysatePIP is secreted and may be more abundant in conditioned medium
💡Expected PIP appearanceThe predicted 16.6 kDa mass is for the precursor; signal peptide removal and possible Asn105 glycosylation may affect migration, but no empirical band size is supplied, so confirm identity with controls.
How each factor affects band size
Predicted precursor mass16.6 kDa before signal peptide removal or modification
Signal peptide at residues 1–28cleavage produces a smaller mature chain than the precursor
N-linked glycosylation site at Asn105glycosylation could increase apparent size; the shift is not established
Unglycosylated Asn105 formcould migrate below a glycosylated form if both are present
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
No band in lysatePIP is secretedcheck conditioned medium and a positive control
Band higher than expectedpossible Asn105 glycosylation; the size effect is unverifiedcompare untreated and deglycosylated samples with a positive control
Band lower than expectedsignal peptide removal may yield a smaller mature chaincompare lysate and conditioned medium and verify antibody specificity
Multiple bandsprecursor and mature forms or differing Asn105 glycosylation may be presentcompare sample fractions and use a specificity control
Weak or no signalsecreted PIP may be scarce in the sampled lysatetest conditioned medium and a known positive sample

Sample controls for PIP Western blot

🧪HPA-IHC candidate guidance (verify in WB): For positive controls for PIP in Western blot, you can use salivary gland tissue.
Positive control: Salivary gland (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Negative control: Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain alongside the samples.
⚠️Feasibility: PIP is secreted, so conditioned medium may yield a stronger signal than whole-cell lysate.

HPA tissue expression evidence for PIP

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Salivary gland glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Breast glandular cells Medium Protein (IHC) HPA →

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Adipose tissue adipocytes Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Adrenal gland glandular cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Appendix glandular cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Bone marrow hematopoietic cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Bronchus respiratory epithelial cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Section 3

Advanced PIP Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for PIP, answered from its protein features.

How should PIP band migration be interpreted?
Band shift · Use the separately labelled calculated mass and catalog-observed evidence above. A sequence annotation does not establish an observed migration shift. Verify target identity with orthogonal controls.
Could PIP isoforms explain multiple bands?
Isoforms · The supplied UniProt record lists one isoform and no alternative sequence. It therefore provides no isoform-based explanation for multiple bands. Compare bands with the listed signal-peptide processing and modification features before assigning identities.
Where are PIP's listed modifications?
PTM · In UniProt numbering, residue 29 has pyrrolidone carboxylic acid and Asn105 is an N-linked glycosylation site. Residue 29 follows the 1–28 signal peptide. Check the numbering convention before comparing these sites with an antibody datasheet or paper.
Does this guide establish induction of PIP?
Induction · No general induction response is established by this guide. A pathway or gene-set association is not evidence of induction in a particular specimen. Verify the relevant treatment and control in a target-specific experiment.
What transfer method to use for PIP Western blot?
Transfer · PIP is predicted to be 16.6 kDa before removal of its 1–28 signal peptide. Use transfer conditions suited to a small protein, such as a 0.2 µm membrane, and check the post-transfer gel for protein left behind.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the M04543-2 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
How should secreted PIP be quantified?
Quantitation · PIP is annotated as secreted. Compare the same sample fraction across conditions, and keep conditioned-medium collection and loading consistent. A lysate measurement alone may miss PIP released into the medium.
Why might PIP migrate differently from its predicted 16.6 kDa mass?
Interpretation · The 16.6 kDa prediction includes the 1–28 signal peptide, which is removed from secreted PIP. UniProt also lists N-linked glycosylation at Asn105 and pyrrolidone carboxylic acid at residue 29. These features are relevant when interpreting migration, but they do not establish a visible shift or its size.

Check whether bands differ between conditioned medium and lysate, since PIP is secreted and has a 1–28 signal peptide. Its listed Asn105 glycosylation and two disulfide bonds may also affect migration under different sample conditions. The features alone cannot identify an unexpected band.

UniProt lists two disulfide bonds in PIP. Compare matched reduced and nonreduced samples if migration differs between preparations. A mobility change under those conditions would be consistent with disulfide-dependent structure, but would not by itself establish band identity.
Boster reagents

PIP Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western blot analysis of GCDFP 15 expression in T47D cell lysate.
Anti-GCDFP 15 Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody
Cat # M04543-2

The listed anti-PIP antibody, M04543-2, is a rabbit monoclonal with stated human reactivity. Its Western blot image shows GCDFP 15 expression in T47D cell lysate. No broader sample or species validation is supplied.

Which to pick: M04543-2 is the only listed option and has a Western blot image from T47D cell lysate. Consider it for human PIP Western blotting; performance in other samples is not established by the supplied evidence.

Source: BosterBio PIP gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.