POLK / DNA polymerase kappa · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for POLK

Real validated POLK Western blot protocols, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-POLK WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled September 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for POLK: expected band ~98.8 kDa, hero antibody A01987-1, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable POLK Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~98.8 kDa, antibody A01987-1, controls and PMC citations. Open the full POLK WB guide →

POLK Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, validated protocols, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~98.8 kDa
Gel 8–10% (standard starting point)
Negative control ⓘ Suggested KO / knockdown lysate
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM —
Caveat —
Gene-set association MSigDB C7 membership
Isoform 8 isoform(s)
Section 1

Real Curated POLK Western Blot Protocols

The A01987-1 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysateextracts of various cell lines, (catalog A01987-1)
Gel %8–10% (standard starting point)
Load20–30 µg total protein per lane; optimize for abundance (standard starting point)
TransferStandard semi-dry transfer; verify efficiency (standard starting point)
Membrane0.45 µm PVDF (standard starting point)
BlockingBlocking buffer: 3% nonfat dry milk in TBST (catalog A01987-1)
Primary antibodyA01987-1 · 1:1000 (catalog A01987-1)
Primary incubationOvernight at 4 °C (standard starting point)
Secondary antibodyGoat Anti-Rabbit IgG, 1:10000 (catalog A01987-1)
Secondary incubation1 h at room temperature (standard starting point)
Wash3 × 5 min in TBST (standard starting point)
DetectionECL (catalog A01987-1)
Section 2

What Is the Expected POLK Western Blot Band Size?

POLK is predicted at 98.8 kDa; eight isoforms could affect migration, but no distinct isoform bands or empirical band size are demonstrated.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Band near 98.8 kDaConsistent with the predicted POLK mass; confirm identity with controls
Single sharp bandAnnotated isoforms may be absent or unresolved
Two bands at different positionsCould reflect expressed isoforms if both bands are confirmed as POLK
Several discrete bandsCould reflect multiple expressed isoforms; their migration is unverified
💡Expected POLK appearancePOLK has a predicted mass of 98.8 kDa and eight annotated isoforms, but no empirical band size or isoform migration is supplied; confirm any candidate band with ordinary band-identity controls.
How each factor affects band size
Predicted POLK massSets a 98.8 kDa reference for the supplied sequence
Isoforms 1, 2 and 3May differ in size; individual masses and migration are unknown
Isoforms 4, 5 and 6May differ in size; individual masses and migration are unknown
Isoforms 7 and 8May differ in size; individual masses and migration are unknown
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
No band in lysateNuclear POLK may be difficult to detect in whole-cell lysateCheck a nuclear-enriched fraction and a positive control
Band higher than expectedIts identity is uncertain; no listed modification establishes an upward shiftCompare with a positive control and verify antibody specificity
Band lower than expectedAn alternative isoform is possible, but its mass is unknownConfirm POLK identity with a second antibody or POLK-depleted sample
Multiple bandsExpressed isoforms are possible, but distinct migration is unverifiedCompare bands with a POLK-depleted control
Weak or no signalNuclear localization may limit signal in the tested lysateCheck a nuclear-enriched fraction and confirm antibody performance with a positive control

Sample controls for POLK Western blot

🧪For positive controls for POLK in Western blot, you can use no HPA-supported tissue or cell line from the supplied evidence.
Positive control: No high/medium HPA tissue identified
Negative control: Suggested KO / knockdown lysate
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain alongside the samples.
⚠️Feasibility: HPA provides no tissue data, so suitable tissue controls cannot be verified.

HPA tissue expression evidence for POLK

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
No high/medium HPA tissues identified in the supplied evidence.

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
No lower-expression tissue rows available in the supplied evidence.
Section 3

Advanced POLK Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for POLK, answered from its protein features.

How should POLK band migration be interpreted?
Band shift · Use the separately labelled calculated mass and catalog-observed evidence above. A sequence annotation does not establish an observed migration shift. Verify target identity with orthogonal controls.
Which POLK isoforms could produce smaller bands?
Isoforms · Eight isoforms are listed. Relative to the 870-residue canonical sequence, isoform 3 lacks residues 312–509; isoforms 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 lack substantial C-terminal segments. Isoforms 4, 7 and 8 also lack residues 1–90. These sequence differences could change band positions, but the features do not establish where any isoform runs.
Are annotated modifications available to explain a POLK band shift?
PTM · No modified residues or glycosylation sites are listed in the supplied features. Do not assign a shifted band to a specific modification from this record. Isoform sequence differences are documented, but they also do not establish the cause of an observed shift.
Does UV irradiation induce POLK protein abundance?
Induction · The supplied location feature says POLK is recruited to DNA damage sites after ultraviolet irradiation. It does not say total POLK abundance increases. Compare matched samples if testing abundance, and distinguish a change in localization from a change in total signal.
How should transfer be checked for POLK?
Transfer · Standard workflow guidance: verify transfer efficiency for the intended target size before interpreting a weak signal. Use total-protein assessment and optimize transfer for the membrane, gel and apparatus; the labelled catalog values take precedence.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the A01987-1 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
How should POLK Western blot signal be quantified after DNA damage?
Quantitation · POLK is detected throughout the nucleus and at replication foci, and is recruited to DNA damage sites after ultraviolet irradiation. Quantify comparable sample fractions and loading across conditions. A change in signal from a selected fraction may reflect redistribution; these features alone do not establish a change in total protein abundance.
Should POLK run at its predicted 98.8 kDa?
Interpretation · 98.8 kDa is the predicted mass for canonical POLK. No observed band position is supplied, so an apparent mass difference cannot be assessed from these features alone. Use a molecular weight marker and consider which isoform the antibody detects.

Check the epitope against the UniProt coordinates. An epitope in residues 1–90 is absent from isoforms 4, 7 and 8. An epitope in residues 490–870 is absent from isoforms 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7; isoform 3 lacks residues 312–509. This helps identify which isoforms the antibody could detect.

First compare each band's position with the 98.8 kDa canonical prediction and the listed alternative sequences. Several isoforms delete large regions, while isoforms 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 also replace sequence near residues 453–472. Check whether the antibody epitope is retained. With no observed band or modification site supplied, these features cannot identify an unexpected band by themselves.
Boster reagents

POLK Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western blot analysis of extracts of various cell lines, using POLK antibody at 1:1000 dilution. Secondary antibody: HRP Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG at 1:10000 dilution. Lysates/proteins: 25ug per lane. Blocking buffer: 3% nonfat dry milk in TBST. Detection: ECL Basic Kit . Exposure time: 5s.
Anti-DNA polymerase kappa POLK Antibody
Cat # A01987-1

The catalog reports an anti-POLK antibody for Western blotting with reported human, mouse, and rat reactivity. Its WB image uses cell-line extracts at a 1:1000 primary dilution and 25 µg protein per lane; the caption does not identify the cell lines.

Which to pick: A01987-1 is the only listed option and has a WB image. Check its reported reactivity against your sample species, then use the caption’s 1:1000 primary dilution as a starting point.

Source: BosterBio POLK gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.