PTER / N-acetyltaurine hydrolase · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for PTER

Source-linked PTER Western blot protocol options, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-PTER WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled September 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for PTER: expected band ~39 kDa, hero antibody A08763, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable PTER Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~39 kDa, antibody A08763, controls and PMC citations. Open the full PTER WB guide →

PTER Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, source-linked protocol options, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~39 kDa
Gel 12–15% (standard starting point)
Positive control ⓘ Colon (IHC candidate; verify WB) +4 more
Negative control ⓘ Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM —
Caveat —
Gene-set association MSigDB C7 membership
Isoform 2 isoform(s)
Section 1

Source-Linked PTER Western Blot Protocol Options

The A08763 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysatehuman kidney tissue lysate (catalog A08763)
Gel %12–15% (standard starting point)
Load20–30 µg total protein per lane; optimize for abundance (standard starting point)
TransferStandard semi-dry transfer; verify efficiency (standard starting point)
Membrane0.45 µm PVDF (standard starting point)
Blocking5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST (standard starting point)
Primary antibodyA08763 · (A) 1 and (B) 2 μg/mL (catalog A08763)
Primary incubationOvernight at 4 °C (standard starting point)
Secondary antibodySpecies-matched HRP conjugate at validated dilution (standard starting point)
Secondary incubation1 h at room temperature (standard starting point)
Wash3 × 5 min in TBST (standard starting point)
DetectionECL; bracket exposures to avoid saturation (standard starting point)
Section 2

What Is the Expected PTER Western Blot Band Size?

PTER is predicted at 39 kDa; two annotated isoforms could affect migration, but no distinct bands or empirical size are established.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Single band near 39 kDaconsistent with the predicted PTER mass; identity requires controls
Two bands at different sizescould reflect isoforms 1 and 2; their migration is not established
One band despite two annotated isoformsthe isoforms may not resolve or both may not be detected
Band in a cytosolic fractionconsistent with PTER's annotated cytosolic location
💡Expected PTER appearanceUniProt predicts PTER at 39 kDa; no empirical band size or isoform migration is supplied, so confirm a candidate band with antibody specificity controls.
How each factor affects band size
UniProt predicted massplaces the reference protein near 39 kDa
349 amino acid reference sequenceunderlies the 39 kDa predicted mass
Isoform 1may migrate differently from isoform 2; its size is unspecified
Isoform 2may migrate differently from isoform 1; its size is unspecified
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
No band in lysatecytosolic PTER may be poorly recovered or below detectioncheck cytosolic recovery and use a positive control lysate
Band higher than expectedisoform migration or band identity is unresolvedcompare with a PTER positive control and validate specificity
Band lower than expectedisoform migration or band identity is unresolvedcompare with a PTER positive control and validate specificity
Multiple bandstwo annotated isoforms are possible, but their separation is unknowncheck antibody specificity and compare across controlled samples
Weak or no signalPTER abundance or cytosolic recovery may be lowcheck loading, cytosolic recovery, and a positive control

Sample controls for PTER Western blot

🧪HPA-IHC candidate guidance (verify in WB): For positive controls for PTER in Western blot, you can use colon lysate, where HPA reports high expression.
Positive control: Colon (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Negative control: Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain alongside the samples.
⚠️Feasibility: Cytosolic PTER should be accessible in tissue lysates, though adipose tissue may give little or no signal.

HPA tissue expression evidence for PTER

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Colon glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Fallopian tube glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Gallbladder glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Kidney cells in tubules High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Pancreas exocrine glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Adipose tissue adipocytes Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Bone marrow hematopoietic cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Ovary ovarian stroma cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Skeletal muscle myocytes Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Smooth muscle smooth muscle cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Section 3

Advanced PTER Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for PTER, answered from its protein features.

Where should the main PTER band appear?
Band shift · Use 39 kDa, the supplied predicted mass, as a starting reference. No observed band position is available, so compare the sample with a molecular weight marker rather than assuming an exact apparent mass.
Could PTER isoforms produce different bands?
Isoforms · Two isoforms are listed. Isoform 2 lacks residues 234–280 in UniProt numbering, so its sequence is shorter than isoform 1. Whether the isoforms resolve as separate bands depends on the assay; their observed band positions are not supplied.

Check the antibody epitope against UniProt residues 234–280. An epitope entirely within that segment would be absent from isoform 2; an epitope shared by both isoforms could detect both.

Determine whether one or two bands are resolved before choosing a measurement. For isoform-specific quantitation, measure resolved bands separately and confirm that the antibody recognizes each intended isoform. If they overlap, report the signal as combined PTER rather than assigning it to one isoform.
Should glycosylation or another listed modification explain a shifted band?
PTM · The supplied features list no glycosylation sites or modified residues. Do not assign a shifted band to a specific modification from these data. Even a listed modification would not, by itself, establish a visible shift.
Does this guide establish induction of PTER?
Induction · No general induction response is established by this guide. A pathway or gene-set association is not evidence of induction in a particular specimen. Verify the relevant treatment and control in a target-specific experiment.
How should transfer be checked for PTER?
Transfer · Standard workflow guidance: verify transfer efficiency for the intended target size before interpreting a weak signal. Use total-protein assessment and optimize transfer for the membrane, gel and apparatus; the labelled catalog values take precedence.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the A08763 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
How should PTER be quantified?
Quantitation · Standard workflow guidance: quantify only a validated target band within the linear exposure range. Use consistent sample preparation and loading, retain biological replicates, and avoid interpreting saturation or loading differences as regulation.
Which fraction is appropriate for detecting PTER?
Interpretation · PTER is annotated in the cytoplasm, specifically the cytosol. A cytosolic fraction is therefore a reasonable sample to examine, while checking recovery during fractionation.

Compare its position with the 39 kDa predicted mass and consider the shorter isoform 2, which lacks UniProt residues 234–280. The features do not establish either isoform’s observed mobility or identify other bands; confirm band identity with an appropriate specificity control.
Boster reagents

PTER Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western blot analysis of PTER in human kidney tissue lysate with PTER antibody at (A) 1 and (B) 2 μg/mL.
Anti-PTER Antibody
Cat # A08763
Real WB data Western blot analysis of PTER using anti-PTER antibody (A08763-1). Electrophoresis was performed on a 5-20% SDS-PAGE gel at 70V (Stacking gel) / 90V (Resolving gel) for 2-3 hours. The sample well of each lane was loaded with 30 ug of sample under reducing conditions. Lane 1: rat kidney tissue lysates, Lane 2: mouse kidney tissue lysates. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes. Blocked the membrane with 5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT. The membrane was incubated with rabbit anti-PTER antigen affinity purified polyclonal antibody (Catalog # A08763-1) at 0.5 μg/mL overnight at 4°C, then washed with TBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each and probed with a goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:5000 for 1.5 hour at RT. The signal is developed using an Enhanced Chemiluminescent detection (ECL) kit (Catalog # EK1002) with Tanon 5200 system. A specific band was detected for PTER at approximately 39 kDa. The expected band size for PTER is at 39 kDa.
Anti-PTER Antibody Picoband®
Cat # A08763-1

Two the supplier anti-PTER antibodies are listed with human, mouse, and rat reactivity and WB images. The images show human kidney lysate for A08763 and rat and mouse kidney lysates for A08763-1. No publication evidence is supplied.

Which to pick: For a documented human kidney example, see A08763 at 1–2 μg/mL. For rat or mouse kidney examples, see A08763-1 at 0.5 μg/mL, with a reported band near 39 kDa. Both list reactivity to all three species.

Source: BosterBio PTER gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.

References

  1. UniProt Consortium. UniProt entry Q96BW5.
  2. Human Protein Atlas. PTER tissue expression.
  3. PMC4012828 — target-verified WB comparison