This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.
- Table of Contents
Real validated RAE1 Western blot protocols, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-RAE1 WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.
Expected bands, validated protocols, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.
| Expected band | ~41 kDa | |
| Observed band | ~41 kDa | |
| Gel | 10–12% | |
| Negative control | siRNA / KO lysate |
| PTM | Phosphorylated | |
| Caveat | — | |
| Regulation | Dna repair | |
| Isoform | 1 isoform(s) |
Literature-validated Western blot parameters for RAE1 — gel percentage, transfer, blocking, antibody incubation and detection, extracted from published methods.
| Sample / lysate | human Hela , Lane 2: human HepG2 , Lane 3: human 293T , Lane 4: rat testis , Lane 5: rat thymus . After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes. Blocked the membrane with 5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT. The membrane was incubated with rabbit anti-RAE1 antigen affinity purified polyclonal antibody (Catalog # A04228-2) at 0.5 μg/mL overnight at 4°C, then washed with TBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each and probed with a goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:5000 for 1.5 hour at RT. The signal is developed using an Enhanced Chemiluminescent detection (ECL) kit (Catalog # EK1002) with Tanon 5200 system. A specific band was detected for RAE1 at approximately 41 kDa. The expected band size for RAE1 is at 41 kDa |
| Gel % | 10–12% |
| Load | 30 ug |
| Transfer | nitrocellulose membrane, 150 mA, 50–90 min |
| Membrane | nitrocellulose |
| Blocking | 5% non-fat milk / TBS, 1.5 h RT |
| Primary antibody | 0.5 µg/mL |
| Primary incubation | overnight at 4 °C |
| Secondary antibody | goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP, 1:5000 |
| Wash | TBS-0.1% Tween, 3 × 5 min |
| Detection | ECL |
| Exposure / imaging | Tanon 5200 |
| Observed band | 41 kDa |
RAE1's 41 kDa predicted mass matches its observed ~41 kDa band, since it lacks glycosylation, disulfide dimerization, or proteolytic processing that would shift size.
| single band at ~41 kDa | matches the predicted mass of unmodified monomeric RAE1, consistent with the empirically observed ~41 kDa band |
| no smear or diffuse band | RAE1 has no annotated glycosylation sites, so it should resolve as a sharp band rather than a heterogeneous smear |
| no higher-mass band around ~82 kDa even without reducing agent | RAE1 has no annotated disulfide bonds, so it does not form a covalent homodimer |
| no extra bands at other molecular weights | only one isoform is annotated, so additional bands are not expected from alternative splicing |
| slight upward mobility shift relative to the unmodified 41 kDa backbone | phosphorylation at Thr229 can subtly alter apparent migration without changing the core mass |
| robust band present directly in whole-cell lysate | RAE1 is cytoplasmic, nuclear, and spindle-pole localized rather than secreted, so it remains in standard lysates |
| Predicted mass (41 kDa) | sets the baseline expected migration position for unmodified monomeric RAE1, matching the ~41 kDa observed band |
| Absence of glycosylation sites | prevents smearing or an upward mass shift from carbohydrate addition, keeping the band sharp near predicted size |
| Absence of disulfide bonds | prevents covalent homodimer formation, so no doubled-mass band should appear even under non-reducing conditions |
| Phosphorylation at Thr229 | can cause a slight upward mobility shift relative to the unmodified backbone but not a major mass change |
| Single annotated isoform | means no additional splice-variant bands at other masses should be expected |
| No signal peptide or propeptide | indicates RAE1 is not proteolytically processed, so no smaller cleaved or mature fragment band is expected |
| Situation | Likely cause | Next action |
|---|---|---|
| Band higher than expected | incomplete denaturation or residual interaction with partners like NUP98 or NUMA1 not fully dissociated | use fresh reducing sample buffer, boil the sample fully, and re-run alongside a denatured control |
| Band lower than expected | proteolytic degradation during lysis, since RAE1 has no protective propeptide or processing annotated | add protease inhibitors, keep samples cold throughout, and load fresh rather than freeze-thawed lysate |
| Multiple bands | nonspecific antibody cross-reactivity with other WD-repeat proteins, since only one RAE1 isoform is annotated | validate antibody specificity with a knockdown or knockout control and prefer affinity-purified antibody |
| Weak or no signal | insufficient extraction of nuclear and spindle-pole-associated RAE1 by standard lysis conditions | increase total protein loaded and use a nuclear extraction buffer to better solubilize RAE1 |
| No band in lysate | RAE1 partitioning into nuclear or cytoskeletal fractions that are poorly extracted by mild lysis buffers | switch to a stronger nuclear lysis or fractionation protocol to release RAE1 into the soluble fraction |
Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.
| Tissue | Cell type | Level | Evidence | Source |
|---|
| Tissue | Cell type | Level | Evidence | Source |
|---|
Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for RAE1, answered from its protein features.
BosterBio's RAE1 antibodies are among the best-performing WB antibodies on the market — well cited, thoroughly validated, and orthogonally cross-validated against negative tissues and complementary methods.
For RAE1 Western blot, Boster's A04228-2 is the antibody to reach for first: it ships with a genuine, published WB validation image demonstrating specific band detection under standard SDS-PAGE conditions, giving you a documented starting point for your own optimization.
Which to pick: Only one Boster RAE1 antibody is catalogued here: A04228-2. It has a real WB validation image on file, so it's the default pick; run your own positive/negative control lysates alongside it to confirm specificity in your system before scaling up.