RILP / Rab-interacting lysosomal protein · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for RILP

Source-linked RILP Western blot protocol options, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-RILP WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled September 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for RILP: expected band ~44.2 kDa, hero antibody A03940, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable RILP Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~44.2 kDa, antibody A03940, controls and PMC citations. Open the full RILP WB guide →

RILP Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, source-linked protocol options, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~44.2 kDa
Gel 12–15% (standard starting point)
Negative control ⓘ Suggested KO / knockdown lysate
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM Phosphorylated
Caveat Phosphorylation-state controls
Gene-set association MSigDB C7 membership
Isoform 2 isoform(s)
Section 1

Source-Linked RILP Western Blot Protocol Options

The A03940 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysateA20 cell lysate (catalog A03940)
Gel %12–15% (standard starting point)
Load20–30 µg total protein per lane; optimize for abundance (standard starting point)
TransferStandard semi-dry transfer; verify efficiency (standard starting point)
Membrane0.45 µm PVDF (standard starting point)
Blocking5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST (standard starting point)
Primary antibodyA03940 · 1 μg/mL (catalog A03940)
Primary incubationOvernight at 4 °C (standard starting point)
Secondary antibodySpecies-matched HRP conjugate at validated dilution (standard starting point)
Secondary incubation1 h at room temperature (standard starting point)
Wash3 × 5 min in TBST (standard starting point)
DetectionECL; bracket exposures to avoid saturation (standard starting point)
Section 2

What Is the Expected RILP Western Blot Band Size?

RILP is predicted at 44.2 kDa; homodimerization and isoforms could affect the pattern, but their migration effects are not demonstrated here.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Band near 44.2 kDaConsistent with the predicted RILP mass; confirm identity with controls
Band near 88 kDaCould reflect an SDS-resistant RILP homodimer; dimer migration is unverified
Several bands at different sizesCould include isoforms 1 and 2; distinct migration is unverified
Faint band in a membrane-depleted lysateRILP associates with endosome and lysosome membranes
💡Expected RILP appearanceRILP has a predicted mass of 44.2 kDa, but no empirical band size is supplied; confirm a candidate band with antibody specificity and RILP depletion controls.
How each factor affects band size
Predicted RILP massPlaces the reference band near 44.2 kDa
Homodimer formationCould produce a band near twice the monomer mass if the dimer survives electrophoresis
Isoform 1May migrate differently from isoform 2; relative size is unknown
Isoform 2May migrate differently from isoform 1; relative size is unknown
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
No band in lysateMembrane-associated RILP may be poorly recoveredCheck membrane extraction and compare with an enriched membrane fraction
Band higher than expectedAn SDS-resistant homodimer is possible but unverifiedCompare denaturing conditions and test band identity by RILP depletion
Band lower than expectedAn alternate isoform is possible; its mass is unknownCheck isoform expression and whether the band decreases with RILP depletion
Multiple bandsIsoforms 1 and 2 or phosphorylation may contribute; separate migration is unverifiedUse RILP depletion to identify specific bands and compare phosphatase-treated samples
Weak or no signalRILP recovery from membrane-containing material may be lowCheck extraction, loading, and a positive control lysate

Sample controls for RILP Western blot

🧪For positive controls for RILP in Western blot, you can use no HPA-supported tissue or cell sample from the supplied evidence.
Positive control: No high/medium HPA tissue identified
Negative control: Suggested KO / knockdown lysate
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain such as Ponceau alongside the samples.
⚠️Feasibility: HPA provides no tissue expression data here, so tissue controls cannot be selected; use a knockdown or KO line for a negative control.

HPA tissue expression evidence for RILP

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
No high/medium HPA tissues identified in the supplied evidence.

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
No lower-expression tissue rows available in the supplied evidence.
Section 3

Advanced RILP Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for RILP, answered from its protein features.

How should RILP band migration be interpreted?
Band shift · Use the separately labelled calculated mass and catalog-observed evidence above. A sequence annotation does not establish an observed migration shift. Verify target identity with orthogonal controls.
Could RILP isoforms produce different bands?
Isoforms · Yes. UniProt lists isoforms 1 and 2. Relative to isoform 1, isoform 2 lacks residues 1–210 and replaces WAT at 211–213 with MGA. This substantial sequence difference could affect band position. Check which isoform an antibody recognizes before assigning bands.

Isoform 2 lacks residues 1–210 of isoform 1 and has MGA instead of WAT at 211–213. An antibody whose binding region depends on the missing or changed sequence may recognize the isoforms differently. Check its stated binding region before interpreting a missing or weaker isoform band.
Which phosphorylation sites matter when interpreting RILP bands?
PTM · UniProt lists phosphothreonine at 308 and phosphoserine at 314 and 315, using its sequence coordinates. These sites make phosphorylation a possible consideration, but their presence alone does not establish a detectable band shift. Keep the coordinate convention explicit when comparing an antibody datasheet or paper.
Does this guide establish induction of RILP?
Induction · No general induction response is established by this guide. A pathway or gene-set association is not evidence of induction in a particular specimen. Verify the relevant treatment and control in a target-specific experiment.
How should transfer be checked for RILP?
Transfer · Standard workflow guidance: verify transfer efficiency for the intended target size before interpreting a weak signal. Use total-protein assessment and optimize transfer for the membrane, gel and apparatus; the labelled catalog values take precedence.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the A03940 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
How should RILP be quantified?
Quantitation · Standard workflow guidance: quantify only a validated target band within the linear exposure range. Use consistent sample preparation and loading, retain biological replicates, and avoid interpreting saturation or loading differences as regulation.
Should RILP run exactly at its predicted 44.2 kDa?
Interpretation · 44.2 kDa is the predicted mass; no observed Western blot band position is supplied. Use it as a reference, but do not assign a band by mass alone. The listed phosphorylation sites do not establish a visible shift or explain any difference between predicted and apparent mass.

RILP is listed as a homodimer, so a higher band could raise that possibility. The feature does not show that the dimer survives Western blot sample preparation. Do not assign a higher band to a dimer from size alone; compare it with the expected monomer region and the blot conditions.

RILP is associated with late endosome, lysosome and phagosome membranes. For comparisons, use the same sample fraction and preparation across samples: a change in recovered RILP could reflect its distribution as well as its abundance. State whether the measurement comes from whole-cell material or a membrane-enriched fraction.

UniProt lists isoform 2 as missing residues 1–210, which provides a specific alternative to check for a smaller band. No signal peptide or propeptide is listed here. Compare the antibody’s binding region with the isoform sequences before assigning the band; size alone cannot establish its identity.
Boster reagents

RILP Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western blot analysis of RILP in A20 cell lysate with RILP antibody at 1 μg/mL.
Anti-RILP Antibody
Cat # A03940

The catalog reports one anti-RILP antibody for Western blotting. A03940 is listed as reactive with human and mouse samples and has a WB image using A20 cell lysate at 1 μg/mL. The supplied evidence covers that tested context only.

Which to pick: A03940 is the only listed option. It has a WB image from A20 cell lysate at 1 μg/mL; check that the listed human or mouse reactivity fits your sample.

Source: BosterBio RILP gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.