SOS2 / Son of sevenless homolog 2 · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for SOS2

Source-linked SOS2 Western blot protocol options, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-SOS2 WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled September 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for SOS2: expected band ~153 kDa, hero antibody A05957-1, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable SOS2 Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~153 kDa, antibody A05957-1, controls and PMC citations. Open the full SOS2 WB guide →

SOS2 Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, source-linked protocol options, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~153 kDa
Gel 8–10% (standard starting point)
Positive control ⓘ Bone marrow (IHC candidate; verify WB) +4 more
Negative control ⓘ Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM Methylated
Caveat Modification-state controls
Gene-set association MSigDB C7 membership
Isoform 2 isoform(s)
Section 1

Source-Linked SOS2 Western Blot Protocol Options

The A05957-1 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysateHela, sp2/0, H9C2 (catalog A05957-1)
Gel %8–10% (standard starting point)
Load20–30 µg total protein per lane; optimize for abundance (standard starting point)
TransferWet/tank transfer; optimize duration (standard starting point)
Membrane0.45 µm PVDF (standard starting point)
Blocking5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST (standard starting point)
Primary antibodyA05957-1; use the WB datasheet starting dilution (standard starting point)
Primary incubationOvernight at 4 °C (standard starting point)
Secondary antibodySpecies-matched HRP conjugate at validated dilution (standard starting point)
Secondary incubation1 h at room temperature (standard starting point)
Wash3 × 5 min in TBST (standard starting point)
DetectionECL; bracket exposures to avoid saturation (standard starting point)
Section 2

What Is the Expected SOS2 Western Blot Band Size?

SOS2 is predicted at 153 kDa; isoforms 1 and 2 could affect migration, but no empirical band or distinct isoform sizes are established.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Band near 153 kDaconsistent with the predicted SOS2 size; confirm identity with controls
Single dominant band near 153 kDaisoforms 1 and 2 may not resolve separately
Two bands near the expected regioncould reflect isoforms 1 and 2 if their migration differs; confirm identity
Band at an unexpected positionsize alone cannot establish which SOS2 isoform it represents
💡Expected SOS2 appearanceSOS2 has a predicted mass of 153 kDa, but no empirical band size or isoform migration is supplied; confirm any candidate band with ordinary identity controls.
How each factor affects band size
UniProt predicted massplaces the reference size near 153 kDa without establishing observed migration
Alternative splicingcould change apparent size, but no isoform masses or migration differences are supplied
Isoform 1its individual apparent size is unknown
Isoform 2its size relative to isoform 1 is unknown
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
Multiple bandsisoforms 1 and 2 are annotated, but their migration is unknowncompare isoform-specific expression or depletion controls
Band higher than expectedthe 153 kDa prediction does not establish migration or band identityverify specificity with SOS2 depletion and a molecular weight marker
Band lower than expectedan isoform or unrelated signal is possible; no isoform mass is suppliedcheck epitope coverage and compare SOS2 depletion controls
Weak or no signalSOS2 abundance or antibody recognition may be insufficientuse a positive lysate control and check antibody dilution and exposure
Fragments below expected sizesample degradation is possible; no SOS2 cleavage feature is listedcompare freshly prepared lysate with protease inhibition and verify SOS2 specificity

Sample controls for SOS2 Western blot

🧪HPA-IHC candidate guidance (verify in WB): For positive controls for SOS2 in Western blot, you can use bone marrow lysate.
Positive control: Bone marrow (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Negative control: Adipose tissue (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain alongside the samples.
⚠️Feasibility: HPA reports a not-detected tissue for a negative control, though SOS2 is high in several other tissues.

HPA tissue expression evidence for SOS2

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Bone marrow hematopoietic cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Cerebral cortex neuronal cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Duodenum glandular cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Hippocampus neuronal cells High Protein (IHC) HPA →
Lung macrophages High Protein (IHC) HPA →

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Adipose tissue adipocytes Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Liver cholangiocytes Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Esophagus squamous epithelial cells Low Protein (IHC) HPA →
Skeletal muscle myocytes Low Protein (IHC) HPA →
Spleen cells in white pulp Low Protein (IHC) HPA →
Section 3

Advanced SOS2 Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for SOS2, answered from its protein features.

How should SOS2 band migration be interpreted?
Band shift · Use the separately labelled calculated mass and catalog-observed evidence above. A sequence annotation does not establish an observed migration shift. Verify target identity with orthogonal controls.
Could SOS2 isoforms produce different bands?
Isoforms · UniProt lists isoforms 1 and 2. Isoform 2 lacks residues 324–356 of the canonical sequence, so the isoforms may differ in size. The supplied features do not establish whether they resolve as separate bands.

Determine whether the antibody detects both isoforms: isoform 2 lacks canonical residues 324–356. If bands resolve, report them separately unless the measurement is intended to combine isoforms. The supplied features do not identify an antibody epitope.
Do annotated modifications prove a band shift?
PTM · The linked UniProt record describes protein features. A modification annotation alone does not demonstrate a visible shift; retain any condition or experimental qualifier attached to it.
Does this guide establish induction of SOS2?
Induction · No general induction response is established by this guide. A pathway or gene-set association is not evidence of induction in a particular specimen. Verify the relevant treatment and control in a target-specific experiment.
What transfer method to use for SOS2 Western blot?
Transfer · SOS2 has a predicted mass of 153 kDa. Check transfer efficiency in that size range using a stained membrane or the gel after transfer. The supplied features do not specify a transfer method or settings.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the A05957-1 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
How should SOS2 be quantified?
Quantitation · Standard workflow guidance: quantify only a validated target band within the linear exposure range. Use consistent sample preparation and loading, retain biological replicates, and avoid interpreting saturation or loading differences as regulation.
Should SOS2 migrate at exactly 153 kDa?
Interpretation · 153 kDa is the predicted mass. No observed band size is supplied, so use it as a reference, not an exact migration requirement. The listed features alone do not explain a difference between apparent and predicted mass.

UniProt lists asymmetric dimethylarginine at position 1321. This modification alone does not establish a visible shift or explain an unexpected band. Keep UniProt numbering explicit when comparing site descriptions.

Compare them with the 153 kDa prediction and the 33-residue deletion in isoform 2. Neither feature confirms a band's identity. The listed methylation at UniProt position 1321 does not, by itself, establish a visible band shift.
Boster reagents

SOS2 Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western blot (WB) analysis of SOS2 polyclonal antibody at 1:500 dilution Lane1:Hela cell lysate Lane2:sp2/0 cell lysate Lane3:H9C2 cell lysate
Anti-Son of sevenless homolog 2 SOS2 Antibody
Cat # A05957-1

The catalog reports A05957-1, a polyclonal anti-SOS2 antibody with reported human, mouse, and rat reactivity. Its WB image shows HeLa, sp2/0, and H9C2 lysates at 1:500 dilution. No publication evidence or additional validation is supplied.

Which to pick: A05957-1 is the only listed option. Its WB image uses HeLa, sp2/0, and H9C2 lysates at 1:500; check whether those tested contexts and the reported reactivity fit your experiment.

Source: BosterBio SOS2 gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.