SPDEF / SAM pointed domain-containing Ets transcription factor · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for SPDEF

Real validated SPDEF Western blot protocols, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-SPDEF WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled September 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for SPDEF: expected band ~37.5 kDa, hero antibody A04625-1, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable SPDEF Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~37.5 kDa, antibody A04625-1, controls and PMC citations. Open the full SPDEF WB guide →

SPDEF Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, validated protocols, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~37.5 kDa
Observed band ~44 kDa
Gel 5–20% (catalog A04625-1)
Negative control ⓘ Suggested KO / knockdown lysate
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM —
Caveat Band identity controls
Gene-set association MSigDB Hallmark membership
Isoform 2 isoform(s)
Section 1

Real Curated SPDEF Western Blot Protocols

The A04625-1 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysatehuman MCF-7, human PC-3 (catalog A04625-1)
Gel %5–20% (catalog A04625-1)
Load30 ug; reducing conditions (catalog A04625-1)
Transfera nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes (catalog A04625-1)
Membranenitrocellulose membrane (catalog A04625-1)
Blocking5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT (catalog A04625-1)
Primary antibodyA04625-1 · 0.5 μg/mL (catalog A04625-1)
Primary incubationovernight at 4°C (catalog A04625-1)
Secondary antibodygoat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP, 1:5000 (catalog A04625-1)
Secondary incubation1.5 hour at RT (catalog A04625-1)
WashTBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each (catalog A04625-1)
DetectionECL (catalog A04625-1)
Section 2

What Is the Expected SPDEF Western Blot Band Size?

SPDEF is predicted at 37.5 kDa and observed near 44 kDa; the cause of this difference is not established.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Band near 44 kDaEmpirical SPDEF band in reducing whole-cell blots; confirm identity with controls
Band near 37.5 kDaNear the UniProt predicted mass; confirm identity with controls
Multiple bandsIsoforms 1 and 2 are annotated, but distinct migration is unproven
Faint band in whole-cell lysateNuclear localization may limit signal in an unfractionated sample
💡Expected SPDEF appearanceSPDEF is predicted at 37.5 kDa, while antibody QC shows a band near 44 kDa; the cause of the difference is unestablished, so confirm band identity with ordinary controls.
How each factor affects band size
UniProt predicted mass37.5 kDa is the sequence-based reference; the observed band is near 44 kDa
335-residue sequenceUnderlies the predicted mass but does not establish apparent migration
Isoform 1Its mass relative to isoform 2 is not supplied
Isoform 2Its mass relative to isoform 1 is not supplied
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
No band in lysateNuclear SPDEF may be poorly represented in the sampleCheck a nuclear fraction and a known positive lysate
Band higher than expectedThe observed SPDEF band is near 44 kDa versus a 37.5 kDa prediction; the cause is unknownCompare with a positive control and verify specificity by SPDEF depletion
Band lower than expectedIsoform-dependent migration is possible but unestablishedCheck the antibody epitope and verify the band by SPDEF depletion
Multiple bandsIsoforms 1 and 2 are annotated, but their band positions are unknownCompare bands with a positive control and SPDEF depletion
Weak or no signalNuclear localization may reduce signal in whole-cell lysateCheck a nuclear fraction and sample expression with a positive control

Sample controls for SPDEF Western blot

🧪For positive controls for SPDEF in Western blot, you can use no HPA-supported tissue or cell sample because none is provided.
Positive control: No high/medium HPA tissue identified
Negative control: Suggested KO / knockdown lysate
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain alongside the samples.
⚠️Feasibility: HPA has no expression data, so tissue controls cannot be selected reliably.

HPA tissue expression evidence for SPDEF

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
No high/medium HPA tissues identified in the supplied evidence.

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
No lower-expression tissue rows available in the supplied evidence.
Section 3

Advanced SPDEF Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for SPDEF, answered from its protein features.

How should SPDEF band migration be interpreted?
Band shift · Use the separately labelled calculated mass and catalog-observed evidence above. A sequence annotation does not establish an observed migration shift. Verify target identity with orthogonal controls.
Could SPDEF isoforms produce different bands?
Isoforms · UniProt lists two isoforms. Isoform 2 lacks residues 212–227 of the canonical sequence, so it has a shorter sequence. The feature alone does not establish whether the isoforms resolve as separate bands. Check whether the antibody recognizes a region retained in both isoforms.

Decide whether the measurement represents one band or the combined SPDEF signal. Isoform 2 lacks canonical residues 212–227, so antibody recognition and band resolution matter. Apply the same band selection and sample fraction across all lanes.
Do annotated modifications explain the apparent SPDEF band shift?
PTM · The supplied features list no modified residues or glycosylation sites. They therefore provide no specific modification that explains the difference between the predicted 37.5 kDa and observed approximately 44 kDa bands. Do not assign that difference to a PTM from these data.
Does this guide establish induction of SPDEF?
Induction · No general induction response is established by this guide. A pathway or gene-set association is not evidence of induction in a particular specimen. Verify the relevant treatment and control in a target-specific experiment.
How should transfer be checked for SPDEF?
Transfer · Standard workflow guidance: verify transfer efficiency for the intended target size before interpreting a weak signal. Use total-protein assessment and optimize transfer for the membrane, gel and apparatus; the labelled catalog values take precedence.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the A04625-1 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
How should SPDEF be quantified?
Quantitation · Standard workflow guidance: quantify only a validated target band within the linear exposure range. Use consistent sample preparation and loading, retain biological replicates, and avoid interpreting saturation or loading differences as regulation.
Why might SPDEF appear near 44 kDa instead of 37.5 kDa?
Interpretation · The supplied blots show an apparent band near 44 kDa, while the predicted mass is 37.5 kDa. These data do not establish why they differ. Use the observed position when evaluating a SPDEF blot, and confirm band identity independently.

UniProt places SPDEF in the nucleus. A nuclear fraction may enrich its signal; compare like fractions across samples when measuring abundance. The localization annotation does not establish that every SPDEF molecule is nuclear.

The observed SPDEF band is approximately 44 kDa, and UniProt lists a second isoform missing residues 212–227. Neither fact identifies an unexpected band on its own. Confirm candidate bands with an independent specificity check before assigning them to an isoform or SPDEF.

SPDEF interacts with the androgen receptor DNA-binding domain and with NKX3-1. Those interaction annotations do not identify additional SPDEF bands or explain their apparent masses. Evaluate extra bands for antibody specificity before linking them to these partners.
Boster reagents

SPDEF Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western blot analysis of PSE/SPDEF using anti-PSE/SPDEF antibody (A04625-1). Electrophoresis was performed on a 5-20% SDS-PAGE gel at 70V (Stacking gel) / 90V (Resolving gel) for 2-3 hours. The sample well of each lane was loaded with 30 ug of sample under reducing conditions. Lane 1: human MCF-7 whole cell lysates, Lane 2: human PC-3 whole cell lysates. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes. Blocked the membrane with 5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT. The membrane was incubated with rabbit anti-PSE/SPDEF antigen affinity purified polyclonal antibody (Catalog # A04625-1) at 0.5 μg/mL overnight at 4°C, then washed with TBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each and probed with a goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:5000 for 1.5 hour at RT. The signal is developed using an Enhanced Chemiluminescent detection (ECL) kit (Catalog # EK1002) with Tanon 5200 system. A specific band was detected for PSE/SPDEF at approximately 44 kDa. The expected band size for PSE/SPDEF is at 38 kDa.
Anti-PSE/SPDEF Antibody Picoband®
Cat # A04625-1

The catalog reports one anti-SPDEF antibody, A04625-1, a human-reactive rabbit polyclonal. Its Western blot image uses human MCF-7 and PC-3 whole-cell lysates and shows a band near 44 kDa, versus an expected 38 kDa. Evidence for other sample contexts is not supplied.

Which to pick: A04625-1 is the only listed option and has a Western blot image for human MCF-7 and PC-3 lysates. Consider it for human samples, while checking the observed 44 kDa band against the expected 38 kDa size in your own assay.

Source: BosterBio SPDEF gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.