This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.
- Table of Contents
Plan TIGD1 paraffin-section IHC around the nuclear staining reported in most tissues (HPA tissue IHC). Use the catalog antibody’s 2 μg/ml chromogenic IHC example and compare cell populations with reported medium and undetected staining (datasheet A17411-1; HPA tissue IHC).
Expected localisation, validated protocols, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.
| Expected localisation | Nuclear staining in most tissues (HPA tissue IHC) | |
| Staining pattern | Nuclear signal in most tissues, including glandular cells (HPA tissue IHC) | |
| Antigen retrieval | EDTA pH 8.0 HIER, heat-mediated (datasheet A17411-1) | |
| Positive control | Appendix+4 more · see all | |
| Negative control | Adipose tissue+2 more · see all |
| Fixation | Matched tissue-IHC evidence does not establish the fixation claim. Validate the specimen-specific method before use. (selected-SKU IHC image A17411-1) | |
| Caveat | Staining–RNA consistency is medium; verify the signal (HPA tissue IHC) | |
| Regulation | Regulation not annotated (UniProt) | |
| Isoform / epitope | No isoforms or cleavage annotated; epitope effects unknown (UniProt) |
The catalog antibody’s IHC protocol is supplemented by one published study of TIGD1 staining in human colon cancer tissue (PMC10373975).
| Sample | Paraffin-embedded human cervical cancer tissue; fixative not specified (datasheet A17411-1) |
| Fixation | Image fixative and duration unreported (datasheet A17411-1); verify before use. |
| Sectioning | 4–5 µm sections on charged slides (standard) |
| Deparaffinisation | Xylene, graded ethanol series to water (standard) |
| Antigen retrieval | Heat retrieval: EDTA pH 8.0 (datasheet A17411-1); 20 min, 95–100 °C (standard) |
| Peroxidase block | 3% H2O2, 10 min, room temperature (standard) |
| Blocking | 10% goat serum (datasheet A17411-1) |
| Primary antibody | Rabbit anti-TIGD1, 2-5 μg/ml (datasheet A17411-1) |
| Primary incubation | Overnight at 4 °C (datasheet A17411-1) |
| Detection | HRP-conjugated secondary, DAB chromogen (datasheet A17411-1) |
| Counterstain | Hematoxylin, blue, dehydrate and mount (standard) |
| Expected result | TIGD1-positive staining in glandular cells of appendix (HPA tissue IHC: Medium). HPA tissue profile: Nuclear expression in most tissues. No signal in the no-primary control. |
TIGD1 is a nuclear protein with no transmembrane segment (UniProt Q96MW7). In paraffin-section IHC, expect nuclear staining across many tissues, including medium staining in appendix glandular cells and bone marrow hematopoietic cells (HPA tissue IHC). HPA rates its tissue pattern Approved, with medium agreement between staining and RNA data; external verification is pending (HPA tissue IHC).
| Distinct nuclear staining in glandular cells of appendix or colon, with moderate chromogenic intensity. | This matches the reported medium staining in those cells and the broader nuclear tissue profile (HPA tissue IHC). Assess the proportion and intensity of stained nuclei within each cell population; a positive control showing this pattern supports interpretation of the run, but does not independently establish antibody specificity. |
| Predominantly cytoplasmic, membranous, or extracellular deposits, with little nuclear signal. | That compartment conflicts with nuclear TIGD1 in tissue and the nuclear assignment in UniProt (HPA tissue IHC; UniProt Q96MW7). Treat it as a possible staining artefact or nonspecific signal. Check morphology and the detection controls before calling the specimen TIGD1-positive. |
| Strong staining in adipocytes, ovarian follicle cells, or chondrocytes. | HPA reports TIGD1 as not detected in those respective cell populations (HPA tissue IHC). Unexpected signal raises the possibility of cross-reactivity or endogenous detection activity; first confirm cell identity and compare an appropriate negative control. A single discordant field does not establish which cause applies. |
| Diffuse colour across the section, including stroma or areas without identifiable nuclei. | A field-wide deposit cannot be scored as the reported nuclear pattern (HPA tissue IHC). Background may arise from detection chemistry or insufficient blocking or washing (general IHC practice). Compare the control lacking primary antibody, then judge only signal that remains confined to identifiable cells. |
| No detectable nuclear staining in an appendix or bone marrow positive-control section. | HPA reports medium staining in appendix glandular cells and bone marrow hematopoietic cells (HPA tissue IHC). First consider a failed staining run or unsuitable control area; verify the expected cell population is present and review retrieval, antibody incubation, detection, and counterstain (general IHC practice). |
| Tissue and cell selection | HPA describes nuclear expression in most tissues and low tissue specificity, but its listed intensities differ by cell type (HPA tissue IHC). Use a listed medium-staining population for a positive control and score the relevant cells rather than assuming every nucleus must stain. |
| Antibody evidence | The listed antibody HPA041717 is Approved for IHC, while the tissue pattern has medium agreement with RNA and awaits external verification (HPA antibody validation; HPA tissue IHC). A matching pattern supports interpretation; validation status alone does not resolve unexpected staining. |
| Topology and processing | UniProt places TIGD1 in the nucleus, reports no transmembrane segment or signal peptide, and lists one chain spanning residues 1–591 (UniProt Q96MW7). These annotations support a nuclear expectation; they do not identify this antibody's epitope or establish a retrieval condition. |
| IF/ICC: what pattern should appear? | HPA reports approved localisation at the nucleoli rim and mitotic chromosomes, with additional nucleoplasm and nuclear-body localisation (HPA subcellular ICC-IF). That finer IF pattern can guide image interpretation; routine chromogenic tissue IHC is supported by HPA's broader nuclear description (HPA tissue IHC). |
| Detection chemistry | Endogenous activity or nonspecific detection deposits can imitate staining in chromogenic IHC (general IHC practice). A control processed without primary antibody helps identify that contribution; compare it before attributing unexpected colour to TIGD1. |
| Antigen retrieval and fixation | Retrieval is a general variable in paraffin-section IHC (general IHC practice). Target-specific TIGD1 fixation sensitivity and an optimal retrieval condition are unreported in the supplied UniProt and HPA records; optimise against tissue controls without assuming a particular treatment will restore signal. |
| Situation | Likely cause | Next action |
|---|---|---|
| Positive-control tissue lacks nuclear colour. | The expected cell population may be absent from the section, or an IHC step may have failed (general IHC practice). | Locate appendix glandular or bone marrow hematopoietic cells, both reported at medium intensity (HPA tissue IHC). Check the control run, retrieval, primary-antibody application, and detection sequence before interpreting test sections. |
| Colour is mainly cytoplasmic or membranous. | The compartment disagrees with nuclear TIGD1 localisation (UniProt Q96MW7; HPA tissue IHC); background or incorrect cell identification may explain it. | Recheck cell boundaries against the counterstain and compare a control lacking primary antibody (general IHC practice). Score only convincing nuclear staining in identifiable cells. |
| The whole section has diffuse brown background. | Excess detection signal, incomplete washing, or endogenous activity can obscure localisation (general IHC practice). | Review blocking and wash steps, then compare a control lacking primary antibody (general IHC practice). Repeat scoring only after individual nuclei can be distinguished from background. |
| Adipocytes, follicle cells, or chondrocytes stain strongly. | Those populations are reported as not detected (HPA tissue IHC); cross-reactivity or endogenous activity is possible, but the slide alone cannot distinguish them. | Confirm the cell type by morphology, inspect the control lacking primary antibody, and compare an HPA-supported positive population in the same run (HPA tissue IHC; general IHC practice). |
| Only weak signal appears in a test tissue. | Low staining is reported in several tissues, including thyroid glandular cells and lung type II alveolar cells (HPA tissue IHC). Weak colour alone is therefore inconclusive. | Compare nuclear localisation and cell identity with a medium-staining positive control; record intensity and the fraction of relevant cells (HPA tissue IHC; general IHC practice). |
| An IHC section lacks the nucleoli-rim pattern seen in IF images. | HPA describes nucleoli-rim and mitotic-chromosome detail for ICC-IF, while its tissue IHC summary describes nuclear expression (HPA subcellular ICC-IF; HPA tissue IHC). | Evaluate chromogenic IHC against the reported tissue-level nuclear pattern and appropriate controls. Do not require IF-scale subnuclear detail to call a tissue nucleus positive (HPA tissue IHC; general IHC practice). |
Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue (reliability: Approved — Medium consistency between antibody staining and RNA expression data. Pending external verification.). Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.
| Tissue | Cell type | Level | Evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appendix | Glandular cells | Medium | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Bone marrow | Hematopoietic cells | Medium | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Bronchus | Respiratory epithelial cells | Medium | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Caudate | Neuronal cells | Medium | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
| Cerebral cortex | Neuronal cells | Medium | Protein (IHC) | HPA → |
Troubleshoot TIGD1 staining by checking nuclear localization, specimen handling, detection controls, and cell-specific scoring.
A17411-1 has IHC images from human paraffin sections and IF images from U20S cells and a human colon cancer section (catalog image captions); listed reactivity includes human, mouse, and rat (catalog reactivity).
A17411-1 has IHC images from human paraffin sections of cervical cancer, colorectal adenocarcinoma, ovarian cancer, and spleen (catalog IHC captions). Its IF images show U20S cells and a human colon cancer section; IHC, ICC, and IF are listed applications (catalog IF captions; catalog applications).
Which to pick: For tissue IHC, choose A17411-1: its paraffin-section images use EDTA retrieval at pH 8.0 and 2 μg/ml antibody; the fixative is unreported (catalog IHC captions). For IF/ICC, the same SKU has IF images from U20S cells and a human colon cancer section at 5 μg/ml (catalog IF captions). For cross-species planning, it lists human, mouse, and rat reactivity, but its IHC dilution is specified for human and rat, its pictured IHC is human, and its clonality is unreported (catalog reactivity; catalog dilution; catalog IHC captions; catalog clone field).