XPA · Western blot design guide

XPA Western Blot Planning Guide

Plan a XPA Western blot around the catalog-observed 31.4 kDa band, image-backed A01182-4 evidence, HPA controls, and verified protocol records.

Evidence assembled July 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for XPA (XPA): expected band 31.4 kDa, antibody A01182-4, and guide-derived SDS-PAGE protocol steps
XPA Western blot protocol sheet — expected band 31.4 kDa, antibody A01182-4, controls and PMC citations. Open the full XPA WB guide →

XPA Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, documented protocol parameters, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band 31.4 kDa
Observed band Not reported — verify product WB image
Gel 12-15%
Positive control ⓘ Cervix
Negative control ⓘ Target knockdown/knockout
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
ⓘ Calculated mass 31.4 kDa
ⓘ Localization Nucleus
ⓘ Processing / PTM Record-dependent
ⓘ Reactivity Human
Section 1

Real Curated XPA Western Blot Protocols

Start with the molecular-weight rule, then compare verified publication-derived conditions.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysateAdrenal gland
Gel %12-15%
Load20-30 µg total protein per lane
TransferSemi-dry, standard transfer
Membrane0.45 µm PVDF
Blocking5% non-fat milk or 5% BSA in TBST
PrimaryA01182-4 at datasheet starting dilution
Primary incubationOvernight at 4 °C with gentle agitation
SecondarySpecies-matched HRP conjugate at validated dilution
Wash3 × 5 min in TBST
DetectionChemiluminescent substrate
ExposureBracket exposures to avoid saturation
Section 2

What Is the Expected XPA Western Blot Band Size?

Use the product-observed 31.4 kDa band as the primary planning value and retain the UniProt calculated mass as context.

What am I looking at on my blot?
31.4 kDaMatches the authoritative product WB observation.
31.4 kDa calculatedUse as UniProt context, not as a replacement observed band.
Unexpected additional signalDo not assign identity without orthogonal positive/negative controls.
💡Expected XPA appearancePlan around 31.4 kDa and keep the calculated mass as supporting context.
How each factor affects band size
Catalog-observed band31.4 kDa; use this as the primary experimental expectation.
Calculated mass31.4 kDa from UniProt P23025; retain as context.
Gel selection12-15%; shared with the recommended protocol and poster.
Specificity checkCompare the lead HPA positive and negative controls with A01182-4.
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
31.4 kDaMatches the authoritative product WB observation.Confirm with orthogonal controls and the linked product record.
Additional bandMay reflect processing, modification, or non-specific signal.Run a dilution series and compare positive/negative controls.
Weak signalTarget abundance or transfer may be limiting.Verify transfer, increase positive-control abundance, and bracket exposure.

Sample controls for XPA Western blot

🧪Use Cervix as the first positive-control candidate; no defensible HPA Not detected tissue was available, so use a target knockdown/knockout negative control.
Positive control: Cervix (High)
Negative control: Target knockdown/knockout
HPA protein score determines control status; other expression data is supporting context only.

HPA tissue expression evidence for XPA

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Positive expression · recommended positive controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Cervix Reported tissue cells High Protein (HPA) HPA →
Adrenal gland Reported tissue cells High Protein (HPA) HPA →
Appendix Reported tissue cells High Protein (HPA) HPA →
Bronchus Reported tissue cells High Protein (HPA) HPA →

Undetected expression · recommended negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Section 3

Advanced XPA Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for XPA, answered from its protein features.

Which band should guide the blot?
Use 31.4 kDa, the observation attached to the authoritative A01182-4 WB record.
How should calculated mass be interpreted?
Treat the UniProt calculated mass as context; it does not replace the catalog-observed 31.4 kDa expectation.
Which positive control should I start with?
Start with Cervix, the lead HPA protein-expression candidate.
Which negative control is defensible?
Use a target knockdown/knockout control when no HPA Not detected tissue is available.
Which gel should I use?
Use 12-15% consistently across the quick facts, protocol table, and poster.
What transfer method to use for XPA Western blot?
Use the transfer method in the recommended protocol and verify transfer before blocking.
How should A01182-4 be started?
Start at the linked datasheet condition and run a three-point primary-antibody dilution test.
Which publication-derived protocols can I compare?
No verified publication protocol was supplied; use only the deterministic recommended protocol.
Boster reagents

XPA Western Blot Reagents

Human-reactive XPA Western blot reagents with authoritative product imagery.

Real WB data Western blot validation image for XPA using A01182-4; observed band 31.4 kDa
Anti-XPA Antibody Picoband®
Cat # A01182-4

Only image-backed, WB-validated Human/Mouse/Rat recommendations from the prepared catalog evidence are shown.

Source: prepared picoband-wb product evidence; each card retains its own SKU, URL, observed band, and authoritative WB image.

References

  1. UniProt P23025
  2. Human Protein Atlas — XPA
  3. A01182-4 product record
  4. PMC3082913 — Regulation of nucleotide excision repair activity by transcriptional and post-transcriptional control of the XPA protein (Nucleic acids research, 2011)
  5. PMC8748394 — XPA is susceptible to proteolytic cleavage by cathepsin L during lysis of quiescent cells (DNA repair, 2022)
  6. PMC5731452 — Transcriptional consequences of XPA disruption in human cell lines (DNA repair, 2017)