GCLM / Glutamate--cysteine ligase regulatory subunit · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for GCLM

Real validated GCLM Western blot protocols, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-GCLM WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled September 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for GCLM: expected band ~30.7 kDa, hero antibody A02948-2, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable GCLM Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~30.7 kDa, antibody A02948-2, controls and PMC citations. Open the full GCLM WB guide →

GCLM Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, validated protocols, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~30.7 kDa
Observed band Approximately 31 kDa
Gel 5–20% (catalog A02948-2)
Positive control ⓘ Adrenal gland (IHC candidate; verify WB) +4 more
Negative control ⓘ Ovary (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM Acetylated
Caveat Modification-state controls
Gene-set association MSigDB Hallmark membership
Isoform 2 isoform(s)
Section 1

Real Curated GCLM Western Blot Protocols

The A02948-2 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysatehuman 293T, human Jurkat, human Hela (catalog A02948-2)
Gel %5–20% (catalog A02948-2)
Load30 ug; reducing conditions (catalog A02948-2)
Transfera nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes (catalog A02948-2)
Membranenitrocellulose membrane (catalog A02948-2)
Blocking5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT (catalog A02948-2)
Primary antibodyA02948-2 · 0.5 μg/mL (catalog A02948-2)
Primary incubationovernight at 4°C (catalog A02948-2)
Secondary antibodygoat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP, 1:5000 (catalog A02948-2)
Secondary incubation1.5 hour at RT (catalog A02948-2)
WashTBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each (catalog A02948-2)
DetectionECL (catalog A02948-2)
Section 2

What Is the Expected GCLM Western Blot Band Size?

GCLM is predicted at 30.7 kDa and observed at approximately 31 kDa; the small difference has no established cause in the supplied evidence.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Band at approximately 31 kDaMatches the empirical GCLM band, close to its 30.7 kDa predicted mass.
One band near 31 kDaIsoforms 1 and 2 need not resolve into separate bands.
Additional band at a different sizeCould reflect an isoform; its migration and identity require confirmation.
No distinct shifted bandLys263 acetylation has no demonstrated visible migration effect.
💡Expected GCLM appearanceGCLM has a predicted mass of 30.7 kDa and an observed band at approximately 31 kDa in whole-cell lysates; confirm band identity with appropriate controls.
How each factor affects band size
UniProt predicted mass30.7 kDa, close to the observed approximately 31 kDa band.
Isoform 1Its individual mass and migration are not supplied.
Isoform 2Its individual mass and migration are not supplied.
Alternative splicingMay yield different sizes, but separate bands are not established.
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
No band in lysateGCLM was detected in whole-cell lysates, so absence has no established feature-based explanation.Check a positive lysate, loading, transfer, and antibody performance.
Band higher than expectedAn isoform is possible, but its migration is unknown.Compare with a positive control and confirm band identity.
Band lower than expectedAn isoform is possible, but its migration is unknown.Compare with a positive control and confirm band identity.
Multiple bandsIsoforms 1 and 2 exist, but distinct bands are not established.Use band-identity controls before assigning bands to isoforms.
Weak or no signalNo supplied feature establishes why signal would be weak.Check loading, transfer, and a positive lysate.
Fragments below expected sizeNo supplied cleavage feature identifies these bands.Check sample integrity and confirm band identity.

Sample controls for GCLM Western blot

🧪HPA-IHC candidate guidance (verify in WB): For positive controls for GCLM in Western blot, you can use adrenal gland tissue, which HPA rates as medium expression.
Positive control: Adrenal gland (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Negative control: Ovary (IHC candidate; verify WB)
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain alongside the samples.
⚠️Feasibility: HPA lists ovary as not detected, but the adrenal gland signal is only medium, so the positive control may be modest.

HPA tissue expression evidence for GCLM

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Adrenal gland glandular cells Medium Protein (IHC) HPA →
Appendix glandular cells Medium Protein (IHC) HPA →
Bone marrow hematopoietic cells Medium Protein (IHC) HPA →
Breast glandular cells Medium Protein (IHC) HPA →
Bronchus respiratory epithelial cells Medium Protein (IHC) HPA →

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Ovary ovarian stroma cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Vagina squamous epithelial cells Not detected Protein (IHC) HPA →
Adipose tissue adipocytes Low Protein (IHC) HPA →
Cervix glandular cells Low Protein (IHC) HPA →
Esophagus squamous epithelial cells Low Protein (IHC) HPA →
Section 3

Advanced GCLM Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for GCLM, answered from its protein features.

How should GCLM band migration be interpreted?
Band shift · Use the separately labelled calculated mass and catalog-observed evidence above. A sequence annotation does not establish an observed migration shift. Verify target identity with orthogonal controls.
Could GCLM isoforms produce different bands?
Isoforms · UniProt lists isoforms 1 and 2. Isoform 2 lacks residues 43–64 of the canonical sequence, so consider isoform expression when interpreting a smaller band. The sequence difference alone does not establish where either isoform will migrate.

If the epitope lies within canonical residues 43–64, an antibody may miss isoform 2, which lacks that segment. Check the antibody’s mapped epitope before treating a single detected band as total GCLM.
Does acetylation explain a shifted GCLM band?
PTM · UniProt lists N6-acetyllysine at canonical residue 263. This modification alone does not demonstrate a visible band shift or explain any observed-versus-calculated mass difference. If comparing isoform numbering, account for isoform 2’s missing residues 43–64.
Does this guide establish induction of GCLM?
Induction · No general induction response is established by this guide. A pathway or gene-set association is not evidence of induction in a particular specimen. Verify the relevant treatment and control in a target-specific experiment.
How should transfer be checked for GCLM?
Transfer · Standard workflow guidance: verify transfer efficiency for the intended target size before interpreting a weak signal. Use total-protein assessment and optimize transfer for the membrane, gel and apparatus; the labelled catalog values take precedence.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the A02948-2 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
How should GCLM bands be quantified?
Quantitation · Decide whether the measurement should include both isoforms. An antibody recognizing a region shared by isoforms 1 and 2 is more suitable for that purpose than one targeting residues 43–64, which isoform 2 lacks. Record which bands are included in the measurement.
Why does GCLM appear near 31 kDa?
Interpretation · The supplied predicted mass is 30.7 kDa, and the observed band is approximately 31 kDa. These values are consistent; the listed features do not establish a band shift.

Consider isoform 2 if a smaller band appears: it lacks canonical residues 43–64. GCLM also forms a heterodimer with a catalytic heavy chain, but the supplied features do not assign an unexpected band to that complex. Verify band identity before interpreting it as GCLM.
Boster reagents

GCLM Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western blot analysis of GCLM using anti-GCLM antibody (A02948-2). Electrophoresis was performed on a 5-20% SDS-PAGE gel at 70V (Stacking gel) / 90V (Resolving gel) for 2-3 hours. The sample well of each lane was loaded with 30 ug of sample under reducing conditions. Lane 1: human 293T whole cell lysates, Lane 2: human Jurkat whole cell lysates, Lane 3: human Hela whole cell lysates, Lane 4: rat L6 whole cell lysates, Lane 5: mouse NIH/3T3 whole cell lysates. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes. Blocked the membrane with 5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hour at RT. The membrane was incubated with rabbit anti-GCLM antigen affinity purified polyclonal antibody (Catalog # A02948-2) at 0.5 μg/mL overnight at 4°C, then washed with TBS-0.1%Tween 3 times with 5 minutes each and probed with a goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:5000 for 1.5 hour at RT. The signal is developed using an Enhanced Chemiluminescent detection (ECL) kit (Catalog # EK1002) with Tanon 5200 system. A specific band was detected for GCLM at approximately 31 kDa. The expected band size for GCLM is at 31 kDa.
Anti-GCLM Antibody Picoband®
Cat # A02948-2
Real WB data Western blot analysis of GCLM expression in K562 cell lysate.
Anti-GCLM Monoclonal Antibody
Cat # M02948
Real WB data Immunoprecipitate (IP) analysis using the Antibody at 1:50 dilution. (wb at 1:3K dilution)
Anti-GCLM Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody
Cat # M02948-2

Three the supplier anti-GCLM antibodies list human, mouse, and rat reactivity. A02948-2 has a WB image with human, rat, and mouse lysates and a reported 31 kDa band; M02948 shows K562 lysate. M02948-2 shows IP followed by WB, with limited context.

Which to pick: Choose A02948-2 for the most detailed direct WB example, including human 293T, Jurkat, HeLa, rat L6, and mouse NIH/3T3 lysates. M02948 has a K562 WB example. M02948-2 documents IP followed by WB; its image does not establish direct lysate WB performance.

Source: BosterBio GCLM gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.