TMIGD1 / Transmembrane and immunoglobulin domain-containing protein 1 · Western blot design guide

Design a Western Blot for TMIGD1

Source-linked TMIGD1 Western blot protocol options, expected-band and isoform facts, troubleshooting for weak or shifted signal, and recommended anti-TMIGD1 WB antibodies. Everything you need to plan the experiment before you commit precious samples.

Evidence assembled October 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for TMIGD1: expected band ~29.2 kDa, hero antibody A16616, catalog values and labelled standard workflow; separate PMC comparisons on the guide
Printable TMIGD1 Western blot protocol sheet — expected band ~29.2 kDa, antibody A16616, controls and PMC citations. Open the full TMIGD1 WB guide →

TMIGD1 Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, source-linked protocol options, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band ~29.2 kDa
Observed band 68 kDa
Gel 12–15% (standard starting point)
Negative control ⓘ Suggested KO / knockdown lysate
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
PTM Glycosylated + Cleaved
Caveat Glycosylation-state controls
Gene-set association MSigDB C7 membership
Isoform 2 isoform(s)
Section 1

Source-Linked TMIGD1 Western Blot Protocol Options

The A16616 protocol combines labelled catalog values with standard starting conditions. Published comparisons retain their own sample, reagent and detection scope.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysaterat liver tissue lysate (catalog A16616)
Gel %12–15% (standard starting point)
Load20–30 µg total protein per lane; optimize for abundance (standard starting point)
TransferShort semi-dry transfer; verify retention (standard starting point)
Membrane0.45 µm PVDF (standard starting point)
Blocking5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST (standard starting point)
Primary antibodyA16616 · (A) 1 and (B) 2 μg/ml (catalog A16616)
Primary incubationOvernight at 4 °C (standard starting point)
Secondary antibodySpecies-matched HRP conjugate at validated dilution (standard starting point)
Secondary incubation1 h at room temperature (standard starting point)
Wash3 × 5 min in TBST (standard starting point)
DetectionECL; bracket exposures to avoid saturation (standard starting point)
Section 2

What Is the Expected TMIGD1 Western Blot Band Size?

TMIGD1 is predicted at 29.2 kDa, while an empirical blot band is 68 kDa; the cause of that difference is not established.

What am I looking at on my blot?
Band at 68 kDaEmpirical TMIGD1 band; confirm identity with antibody controls
Band near 29.2 kDaNear the predicted full-length precursor mass; identity requires confirmation
Higher band near twice the monomer sizePossible homodimer if it persists during electrophoresis
Band below the precursor positionCould reflect removal of the 1–29 signal peptide
Several bands at different positionsIsoforms 1 and 2 are possible contributors, but distinct migration is unestablished
Band above the unmodified precursor positionN-linked glycosylation could contribute; the size effect is unquantified
💡Expected TMIGD1 appearanceTMIGD1 has a predicted 29.2 kDa precursor mass and an empirical 68 kDa band; the difference is unexplained by the supplied evidence, so confirm band identity with antibody controls.
How each factor affects band size
Predicted precursor mass29.2 kDa provides a sequence-based reference, not a validated migration position
N-linked glycosylation at Asn58, Asn83, Asn118, Asn158 and Asn190Could increase apparent size; occupancy and migration effects are not supplied
Homodimer formationCould yield a higher band near twice the monomer size if preserved
Splice isoforms 1 and 2May differ in size; their masses and migration difference are not supplied
Signal peptide at residues 1–29Cleavage could make mature protein smaller than the full-length precursor
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
No band in lysateTMIGD1 is a membrane protein and may be poorly extractedCheck membrane protein recovery and a positive lysate control
Band higher than expectedGlycosylation or persistent homodimers could affect migration; neither establishes the 68 kDa identityCompare reducing conditions and use an independent antibody or TMIGD1 depletion control
Band lower than expectedSignal peptide cleavage could reduce the precursor sizeCheck epitope location and confirm identity with an independent antibody
Broad smear instead of sharp bandHeterogeneous N-linked glycosylation is possibleCompare untreated and deglycosylated samples with appropriate controls
Multiple bandsIsoforms 1 and 2 or different processing states are possibleCompare antibodies targeting shared and isoform-specific regions if available
Weak or no signalIncomplete recovery of membrane-associated TMIGD1 is possibleCheck extraction, sample loading and a positive control

Sample controls for TMIGD1 Western blot

🧪For positive controls for TMIGD1 in Western blot, you can use no HPA-supported tissue or cell sample because none was supplied.
Positive control: No high/medium HPA tissue identified
Negative control: Suggested KO / knockdown lysate
Loading controls: Run GAPDH, β-actin, and a total-protein stain alongside the samples.
⚠️Feasibility: HPA tissue controls cannot be selected without expression data; a TMIGD1 knockdown or KO can provide a negative control.

HPA tissue expression evidence for TMIGD1

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Higher expression tissues · candidate positive controls from IHC

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
No high/medium HPA tissues identified in the supplied evidence.

Lower expression tissues · IHC evidence, not confirmed WB-negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
No lower-expression tissue rows available in the supplied evidence.
Section 3

Advanced TMIGD1 Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for TMIGD1, answered from its protein features.

How should TMIGD1 band migration be interpreted?
Band shift · Use the separately labelled calculated mass and catalog-observed evidence above. A sequence annotation does not establish an observed migration shift. Verify target identity with orthogonal controls.
Could TMIGD1 isoforms produce different bands?
Isoforms · UniProt lists isoforms 1 and 2. Relative to isoform 1, isoform 2 has DKTVG replaced by ALHEG at residues 214–218 and lacks residues 219–262. Check whether the antibody epitope is retained before assigning a band to either isoform; their annotated sequence difference does not establish their observed migration.
Which TMIGD1 glycosylation sites could affect band interpretation?
PTM · UniProt annotates N-linked glycosylation at Asn58, Asn83, Asn118, Asn158, and Asn190. These are UniProt sequence coordinates; antibody or publication numbering may differ. A glycosidase comparison can help assess whether glycosylation contributes to band position or breadth.
Does this guide establish induction of TMIGD1?
Induction · No general induction response is established by this guide. A pathway or gene-set association is not evidence of induction in a particular specimen. Verify the relevant treatment and control in a target-specific experiment.
What transfer method to use for TMIGD1 Western blot?
Transfer · TMIGD1 is annotated as a single-pass type I membrane protein. Ensure the sample is adequately solubilized, then check transfer efficiency and adjust transfer conditions empirically. The supplied features do not specify a particular membrane, buffer, or transfer setting.
How should blocking be optimized?
Blocking · Standard workflow guidance: follow the A16616 datasheet where specified. Otherwise compare 5% milk or 5% BSA in TBST; for a phospho-specific assay start with BSA. Optimize background and specific signal with matched controls.
How should TMIGD1 bands be quantified?
Quantitation · Use a consistent band definition across samples and report which band was measured. TMIGD1 has two isoforms, five annotated N-linked glycosylation sites, and a homodimer annotation, so a band at one position cannot be assigned to a particular form from molecular weight alone.
Why might TMIGD1 migrate above its predicted 29.2 kDa mass?
Interpretation · TMIGD1 has five annotated N-linked glycosylation sites and a signal peptide at residues 1–29. These features can affect apparent mass, but the annotations alone do not establish a visible shift or explain the reported 68 kDa band. Compare treated and untreated samples to assess glycosylation's contribution.

TMIGD1 is annotated as a homodimer. Two 29.2 kDa chains total about 58.4 kDa before considering processing or glycosylation, but this does not establish that the reported 68 kDa band is a dimer. Compare band behavior across sample preparation conditions before making that assignment.

UniProt lists two disulfide bonds. Compare reducing and nonreducing sample conditions if band patterns differ; the annotation supports this check but does not predict a specific band position.
Boster reagents

TMIGD1 Western Blot Antibodies

Catalog antibodies with Western blot application and product-specific WB images. Evaluate suitability with the reported sample, controls and experimental conditions.

Real WB data Western blot analysis of TMIGD1 in rat liver tissue lysate with TMIGD1 antibody at (A) 1 and (B) 2 μg/ml.
Anti-TMIGD1 Antibody
Cat # A16616

A16616 is an anti-TMIGD1 antibody listed as reactive with human, mouse, and rat. Its supplied Western blot image uses rat liver tissue lysate at 1 and 2 μg/ml; the supplied evidence does not show human or mouse WB samples.

Which to pick: A16616 is the only listed option. It has a Western blot image from rat liver lysate at 1 and 2 μg/ml. For human or mouse samples, listed reactivity is available, but no corresponding WB image is supplied.

Source: BosterBio TMIGD1 gene-info card — filtered to Western-blot-capable antibodies; each card shows that product's actual WB validation figure.