Epitope Retrieval: HIER vs PIER
Selecting the right antigen retrieval method
The process of fixing a tissue sample with paraformaldehyde causes the formation of peptide crosslinks that serve to preserve tissue architecture and protein localization. These peptide crosslinks can also mask epitopes, making them inaccessible to antibody binding. In order to get good-quality IHC stains, these cross links must be broken in the process known as epitope retrieval.
There are two common methods of epitope retrieval: heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER), and proteolytic-induced epitope retrieval (PIER). Selecting the right method is critical to get the best results for your application.
HIER is the most commonly used method. It involves baking or microwaving the tissue sections in the presence of an antigen retrieval solution such as citrate or EDTA buffer. When using HIER, the choice of buffer is important. Citrate, at pH 6, tends to unmask epitopes more conservatively than EDTA at pH 9. While EDTA can result in a more complete epitope unmasking, it can also increase background signal. Use serial sections to test which solution gives the best results, with proper controls to check for nonspecific staining.
PIER is most commonly performed with proteinase K, trypsin, or pepsin. PIER is much more aggressive than HIER, and can destroy delicate morphological or antigenic features. This aggressiveness makes it unsuitable for delicate samples, but perfect for over-fixed, desiccated, or stubborn samples. PIER is generally not recommended for most sample types, as the intensity of the protein degradation is usually unnecessary to effectively unmask antigens.
Keywords: IHC, optimization, HIER vs PIER, heat-induced epitope retrieval, proteolytic-enduce epitope retrieval, antigen retrievalClick for more optimization tips