This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.
- Table of Contents
ERCC2 · Western blot design guide
ERCC2 Western Blot Planning Guide
Plan an ERCC2 Western blot around the catalog-observed 86.9 kDa band, image-backed A00694-2 evidence, HPA controls, and verified protocol records.
Evidence assembled July 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
ERCC2 Western Blot Experimental Design Guide
Expected bands, documented protocol parameters, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.
Must know before running
| Expected band | 86.9 kDa | |
| Observed band | Not reported — verify product WB image | |
| Gel | 8-10% | |
| Positive control | Testis | |
| Negative control | Appendix |
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
| ⓘ | Calculated mass | 86.9 kDa |
| ⓘ | Localization | Nucleus / Cytoplasm, cytoskeleton, spindle |
| ⓘ | Processing / PTM | Record-dependent |
| ⓘ | Reactivity | Human / Mouse / Rat |
Section 1
Real Curated ERCC2 Western Blot Protocols
Start with the molecular-weight rule, then compare verified publication-derived conditions.
| Sample / lysate | Placenta |
| Gel % | 8-10% |
| Load | 20-30 µg total protein per lane |
| Transfer | Semi-dry, standard transfer |
| Membrane | 0.45 µm PVDF |
| Blocking | 5% non-fat milk or 5% BSA in TBST |
| Primary | A00694-2 at datasheet starting dilution |
| Primary incubation | Overnight at 4 °C with gentle agitation |
| Secondary | Species-matched HRP conjugate at validated dilution |
| Wash | 3 × 5 min in TBST |
| Detection | Chemiluminescent substrate |
| Exposure | Bracket exposures to avoid saturation |
Section 2
What Is the Expected ERCC2 Western Blot Band Size?
Use the product-observed 86.9 kDa band as the primary planning value and retain the UniProt calculated mass as context.
| 86.9 kDa | Matches the authoritative product WB observation. |
| 86.9 kDa calculated | Use as UniProt context, not as a replacement observed band. |
| Unexpected additional signal | Do not assign identity without orthogonal positive/negative controls. |
💡Expected ERCC2 appearancePlan around 86.9 kDa and keep the calculated mass as supporting context.
| Catalog-observed band | 86.9 kDa; use this as the primary experimental expectation. |
| Calculated mass | 86.9 kDa from UniProt P18074; retain as context. |
| Gel selection | 8-10%; shared with the recommended protocol and poster. |
| Specificity check | Compare the lead HPA positive and negative controls with A00694-2. |
| Situation | Likely cause | Next action |
|---|---|---|
| 86.9 kDa | Matches the authoritative product WB observation. | Confirm with orthogonal controls and the linked product record. |
| Additional band | May reflect processing, modification, or non-specific signal. | Run a dilution series and compare positive/negative controls. |
| Weak signal | Target abundance or transfer may be limiting. | Verify transfer, increase positive-control abundance, and bracket exposure. |
Experiment evidence
Western blot images showing ERCC2 band
A00694-2 · ERCC2
← swipe / scroll for more images →
Real WB data behind the band-size expectations in this section.
Sample controls for ERCC2 Western blot
🧪Use Testis as the first positive-control candidate and Appendix as the HPA Not detected negative candidate.
Positive control: Testis (High)
Negative control: Appendix (Not detected)
HPA protein score determines control status; other expression data is supporting context only.
HPA tissue expression evidence for ERCC2
Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.
Positive expression · recommended positive controls
| Tissue | Cell type | Level | Evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testis | Reported tissue cells | High | Protein (HPA) | HPA → |
| Skin | Reported tissue cells | High | Protein (HPA) | HPA → |
| Placenta | Reported tissue cells | High | Protein (HPA) | HPA → |
| Breast | Reported tissue cells | Medium | Protein (HPA) | HPA → |
Section 3
Advanced ERCC2 Western Blot Tips
Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for ERCC2, answered from its protein features.
Which band should guide the blot?
Use 86.9 kDa, the observation attached to the authoritative A00694-2 WB record.
How should calculated mass be interpreted?
Treat the UniProt calculated mass as context; it does not replace the catalog-observed 86.9 kDa expectation.
Which positive control should I start with?
Start with Testis, the lead HPA protein-expression candidate.
Which negative control is defensible?
Use Appendix as an orthogonal HPA Not detected candidate.
Which gel should I use?
Use 8-10% consistently across the quick facts, protocol table, and poster.
What transfer method to use for ERCC2 Western blot?
Use the transfer method in the recommended protocol and verify transfer before blocking.
How should A00694-2 be started?
Start at the linked datasheet condition and run a three-point primary-antibody dilution test.
Which publication-derived protocols can I compare?
No verified publication protocol was supplied; use only the deterministic recommended protocol.
Boster reagents
ERCC2 Western Blot Reagents
Human/Mouse/Rat-reactive ERCC2 Western blot reagents with authoritative product imagery.
Real WB data
Anti-XPD/ERCC2 Antibody Picoband®
Cat # A00694-2
Only image-backed, WB-validated Human/Mouse/Rat recommendations from the prepared catalog evidence are shown.
Source: prepared picoband-wb product evidence; each card retains its own SKU, URL, observed band, and authoritative WB image.
References
- UniProt P18074
- Human Protein Atlas — ERCC2
- A00694-2 product record
- PMC5362473 — Genome-wide DNA copy number analysis in clonally expanded human ovarian cancer cells with distinct invasive/migratory capacities (Oncotarget, 2017)
- PMC4238969 — Somatic ERCC2 mutations correlate with cisplatin sensitivity in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (Cancer discovery, 2014)
- PMC8045162 — Excision repair cross-complementing group 2 upregulation is a potential predictive biomarker for oral squamous cell carcinoma recurrence (Oncology letters, 2021)
