UPF3B · Western blot design guide

UPF3B Western Blot Planning Guide

Plan an UPF3B Western blot around the catalog-observed 57.8 kDa band, image-backed PB9843 evidence, HPA controls, and verified protocol records.

Evidence assembled July 2026 · For research use; verify linked source records and product datasheet before use
Western blot protocol sheet for UPF3B (UPF3B): expected band 57.8 kDa, antibody PB9843, and guide-derived SDS-PAGE protocol steps
UPF3B Western blot protocol sheet — expected band 57.8 kDa, antibody PB9843, controls and PMC citations. Open the full UPF3B WB guide →

UPF3B Western Blot Experimental Design Guide

Expected bands, validated protocols, controls and antibodies — the at-a-glance facts below, then the full design guide.

Must know before running
Expected band 57.8 kDa
Observed band Not reported — verify product WB image
Gel 12-15%
Positive control ⓘ Cerebellum
Negative control ⓘ Heart muscle
Important caveats
Reasons your observed band may differ from the expected size.
ⓘ Calculated mass 57.8 kDa
ⓘ Localization Nucleus / Cytoplasm
ⓘ Processing / PTM Record-dependent
ⓘ Reactivity Human / Mouse / Rat
Section 1

Real Curated UPF3B Western Blot Protocols

Start with the molecular-weight rule, then compare verified publication-derived conditions.

Recommended Western blot protocol parameters
Sample / lysateAppendix
Gel %12-15%
Load20-30 µg total protein per lane
TransferSemi-dry, standard transfer
Membrane0.45 µm PVDF
Blocking5% non-fat milk or 5% BSA in TBST
PrimaryPB9843 at datasheet starting dilution
Primary incubationOvernight at 4 °C with gentle agitation
SecondarySpecies-matched HRP conjugate at validated dilution
Wash3 × 5 min in TBST
DetectionChemiluminescent substrate
ExposureBracket exposures to avoid saturation
Section 2

What Is the Expected UPF3B Western Blot Band Size?

Use the product-observed 57.8 kDa band as the primary planning value and retain the UniProt calculated mass as context.

What am I looking at on my blot?
57.8 kDaMatches the authoritative product WB observation.
57.8 kDa calculatedUse as UniProt context, not as a replacement observed band.
Unexpected additional signalDo not assign identity without orthogonal positive/negative controls.
💡Expected UPF3B appearancePlan around 57.8 kDa and keep the calculated mass as supporting context.
How each factor affects band size
Catalog-observed band57.8 kDa; use this as the primary experimental expectation.
Calculated mass57.8 kDa from UniProt Q9BZI7; retain as context.
Gel selection12-15%; shared with the recommended protocol and poster.
Specificity checkCompare the lead HPA positive and negative controls with PB9843.
Why is my band missing or off?
SituationLikely causeNext action
57.8 kDaMatches the authoritative product WB observation.Confirm with orthogonal controls and the linked product record.
Additional bandMay reflect processing, modification, or non-specific signal.Run a dilution series and compare positive/negative controls.
Weak signalTarget abundance or transfer may be limiting.Verify transfer, increase positive-control abundance, and bracket exposure.

Sample controls for UPF3B Western blot

🧪Use Cerebellum as the first positive-control candidate and Heart muscle as the HPA Not detected negative candidate.
Positive control: Cerebellum (Medium)
Negative control: Heart muscle (Not detected)
HPA protein score determines control status; other expression data is supporting context only.

HPA tissue expression evidence for UPF3B

Comprehensive Human Protein Atlas IHC scoring per tissue. Rows are taken directly from the HPA tissue chart — click any row's HPA link to view the source.

Positive expression · recommended positive controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Cerebellum Reported tissue cells Medium Protein (HPA) HPA →
Cervix Reported tissue cells Medium Protein (HPA) HPA →
Caudate Reported tissue cells Medium Protein (HPA) HPA →
Appendix Reported tissue cells Medium Protein (HPA) HPA →

Undetected expression · recommended negative controls

TissueCell typeLevelEvidenceSource
Heart muscle Reported tissue cells Not detected Protein (HPA) HPA →
Smooth muscle Reported tissue cells Not detected Protein (HPA) HPA →
Section 3

Advanced UPF3B Western Blot Tips

Deeper troubleshooting and optimisation questions for UPF3B, answered from its protein features.

Which band should guide the blot?
Use 57.8 kDa, the observation attached to the authoritative PB9843 WB record.
How should calculated mass be interpreted?
Treat the UniProt calculated mass as context; it does not replace the catalog-observed 57.8 kDa expectation.
Which positive control should I start with?
Start with Cerebellum, the lead HPA protein-expression candidate.
Which negative control is defensible?
Use Heart muscle as an orthogonal HPA Not detected candidate.
Which gel should I use?
Use 12-15% consistently across the quick facts, protocol table, and poster.
What transfer method to use for UPF3B Western blot?
Use the transfer method in the recommended protocol and verify transfer before blocking.
How should PB9843 be started?
Start at the linked datasheet condition and run a three-point primary-antibody dilution test.
Which publication-derived protocols can I compare?
No verified publication protocol was supplied; use only the deterministic recommended protocol.
Boster reagents

UPF3B Western Blot Reagents

Human/Mouse/Rat-reactive UPF3B Western blot reagents with authoritative product imagery.

Real WB data Western blot validation image for UPF3B using PB9843; observed band 57.8 kDa
Anti-UPF3B/RENT3B Antibody Picoband®
Cat # PB9843

Only image-backed, WB-validated Human/Mouse/Rat recommendations from the prepared catalog evidence are shown.

Source: prepared picoband-wb product evidence; each card retains its own SKU, URL, observed band, and authoritative WB image.

References

  1. UniProt Q9BZI7
  2. Human Protein Atlas — UPF3B
  3. PB9843 product record
  4. PMC11785583 — HnRNPR-mediated UPF3B mRNA splicing drives hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis (Journal of advanced research, 2025)
  5. PMC9108619 — Human UPF3A and UPF3B enable fault-tolerant activation of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (The EMBO journal, 2022)